Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15 (i7-8705G, Radeon RX Vega M GL)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/28/2018

Excelente hardware, desempenho misto. O Kaby Lake-G tem sido impressionante até agora, mas seu desempenho geral depende inteiramente de como os OEMs implementam o hardware. O HP Spectre x360 15 infelizmente não é o melhor exemplo da plataforma Intel-AMD, com seus substanciais problemas de afogamento.

HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 (Spectre x360 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8705G
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1011 MHz, Memoría: 700 MHz, HBM2, 1.0.2.1
Memória
16384 MB 
, PC4-19200, 1300 MHz, 17-17-17-39, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, native pen support, BOE0730, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, 2048 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SD, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Giroscópio
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.3 x 359 x 250
Bateria
84 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD IR
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Bang & Olufsen, Quad speakers, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Capa de imitação de couro, Guia de início rápido, Cartão de Garantia, WACOM stylus, HP Documentation, McAfee Anti-Virus, HP Pen Control, HP Audio Switch, Radeon Software, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.14 kg, Suprimento de energia: 423 g
Preço
1600 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
178.4 MB/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
138 MB/s ∼77% -23%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
126.3 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.24 MB/s ∼42% -58%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼15% -85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
250.6 MB/s ∼100% +20%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.6 MB/s ∼83%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
200.36 MB/s ∼80% -4%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.96 MB/s ∼37% -55%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼13% -85%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼96% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼91%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
625 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s ∼88% +15%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
521 MBit/s ∼79% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼76%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
503 MBit/s ∼76% -1%
330.4
cd/m²
349.2
cd/m²
327.4
cd/m²
313.7
cd/m²
349.5
cd/m²
331.3
cd/m²
314.7
cd/m²
342.1
cd/m²
316.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 349.5 cd/m² Médio: 330.5 cd/m² Minimum: 18.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 349.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1205:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.06 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 4.22
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 56.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
BOE0730, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Sharp SHP148D, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
BOE0730, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-10%
-25%
-8%
49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 (18, 18)
44 (22, 22)
-22%
48.4 (23.2, 25.2)
-34%
38 (20.4, 17.6)
-6%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
51%
Response Time Black / White *
23.6 (12, 11.6)
22.8 (12, 10.8)
3%
34.8 (19.2, 15.6)
-47%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
-17%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
46%
PWM Frequency
943.4 (99)
1000 (25)
6%
943.4 (99)
0%
Screen
6%
17%
-15%
17%
Brightness middle
349.5
357.6
2%
488
40%
329.3
-6%
254
-27%
Brightness
331
350
6%
440
33%
316
-5%
262
-21%
Brightness Distribution
90
85
-6%
81
-10%
84
-7%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.35
-21%
0.3
-3%
0.31
-7%
0.22
24%
Contrast
1205
1022
-15%
1627
35%
1062
-12%
1155
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.06
4.12
-1%
3.16
22%
4.78
-18%
2.37
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.68
9.91
-29%
8.8
-15%
11.75
-53%
4.71
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.22
4.23
-0%
3.51
17%
1.84
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
1.8
59%
3.3
25%
7.9
-80%
1.58
64%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.17 101%
2.178 101%
2.24 98%
2.48 89%
CCT
7422 88%
6613 98%
6811 95%
8323 78%
6785 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.5
87.5
55%
71.7
27%
58.8
4%
60
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86.9
100
15%
97.9
13%
90.4
4%
92
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 4%
-4% / 7%
-12% / -13%
33% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 943.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 943.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 943.4 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8933 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
178 Points ∼82% +8%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼81% +7%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
174 Points ∼80% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼79% +5%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
165 Points ∼76%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼74% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
Intel Core i5-8305G
157 Points ∼72% -5%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼68% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
147 Points ∼67% -11%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
134 Points ∼61% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1079 Points ∼25% +53%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
864 Points ∼20% +22%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼18% +14%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼17% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
707 Points ∼16%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
699 Points ∼16% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
Intel Core i5-8305G
681 Points ∼16% -4%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
623 Points ∼14% -12%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼12% -26%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
501 Points ∼11% -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
1.99 Points ∼82% +5%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼82% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.97 Points ∼81% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼80% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.89 Points ∼77%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼75% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
Intel Core i5-8305G
1.79 Points ∼73% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points ∼45% +59%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
9.41 Points ∼35% +24%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼32% +14%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼30% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.65 Points ∼28% +1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.59 Points ∼28%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
Intel Core i5-8305G
7.47 Points ∼28% -2%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.89 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
104.31 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
165 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
707 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
124.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5358 Points ∼69% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
5001 Points ∼64% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4958 - 5001, n=2)
4980 Points ∼64% 0%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4958 Points ∼64%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3938 Points ∼51% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=69)
3820 Points ∼49% -23%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4469 Points ∼69% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4456 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4329 - 4469, n=2)
4399 Points ∼68% +2%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4329 Points ∼66%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4323 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=254)
4239 Points ∼65% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4235 Points ∼70% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (3946 - 4235, n=2)
4091 Points ∼67% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3946 Points ∼65%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3661 Points ∼60% -7%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3482 Points ∼57% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=274)
3352 Points ∼55% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3946 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4329 pontos
Ajuda
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Apple SSD AP0512
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
AS SSD
30%
1%
0%
-60%
-19%
Copy Game MB/s
697.83
728.25
4%
944.26
35%
1041.75
49%
735.83
5%
Copy Program MB/s
463.66
430.94
-7%
487.91
5%
486.79
5%
195.39
-58%
Copy ISO MB/s
1674.47
1045.16
-38%
1522.88
-9%
1667.62
0%
1086.72
-35%
Score Total
2720
4065
49%
2132
-22%
2037
-25%
2119
-22%
1515
-44%
Score Write
1145
1547
35%
807
-30%
757
-34%
347
-70%
361
-68%
Score Read
1087
1679
54%
921
-15%
859
-21%
1199
10%
789
-27%
Access Time Write *
0.065
0.036
45%
0.051
22%
0.051
22%
0.034
48%
Access Time Read *
0.047
0.04
15%
0.044
6%
0.054
-15%
0.225
-379%
0.071
-51%
4K-64 Write
950.02
1272.75
34%
637.4
-33%
544.89
-43%
163.46
-83%
175.85
-81%
4K-64 Read
839.57
1431.02
70%
649.44
-23%
646.23
-23%
965.14
15%
568.28
-32%
4K Write
96.87
100.89
4%
94.25
-3%
93.24
-4%
18.78
-81%
111.16
15%
4K Read
20.21
37.78
87%
41.38
105%
38.76
92%
9.46
-53%
43.09
113%
Seq Write
979.74
1728.67
76%
752.11
-23%
1188.51
21%
1643.8
68%
743.4
-24%
Seq Read
2268.6
2098.63
-7%
2302.4
1%
1738.6
-23%
2239.35
-1%
1774.03
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3040.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1046 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 893.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 1037 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 344 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 288.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 16.29 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.3 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 8809G
10391 Points ∼57% +24%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
8935 Points ∼49% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
8786 Points ∼48% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
8633 Points ∼48% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
8405 Points ∼46%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7788 - 8633, n=3)
8275 Points ∼46% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7788 Points ∼43% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
7385 Points ∼41% -12%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5417 Points ∼30% -36%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4296 Points ∼24% -49%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2609 Points ∼14% -69%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
1837 Points ∼10% -78%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 8809G
14302 Points ∼28% +48%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
14180 Points ∼28% +47%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
10118 Points ∼20% +5%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (9632 - 10118, n=3)
9871 Points ∼19% +2%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
9862 Points ∼19% +2%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
9632 Points ∼19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
9147 Points ∼18% -5%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
7693 Points ∼15% -20%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4938 Points ∼10% -49%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4708 Points ∼9% -51%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2728 Points ∼5% -72%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2576 Points ∼5% -73%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
11315 Points ∼28% +60%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 8809G
10248 Points ∼25% +45%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
7610 Points ∼19% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7355 Points ∼18% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
7348 Points ∼18% +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7059 - 7355, n=3)
7254 Points ∼18% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
7059 Points ∼17%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
6145 Points ∼15% -13%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4239 Points ∼10% -40%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3622 Points ∼9% -49%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2115 Points ∼5% -70%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
1713 Points ∼4% -76%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
80748 Points ∼44% +113%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 8809G
59162 Points ∼32% +56%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
51038 Points ∼28% +35%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
44796 Points ∼24% +18%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
42351 Points ∼23% +12%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (37915 - 44796, n=3)
41687 Points ∼23% +10%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
38631 Points ∼21% +2%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
37915 Points ∼21%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
29742 Points ∼16% -22%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
19900 Points ∼11% -48%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
11821 Points ∼6% -69%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
10578 Points ∼6% -72%
3DMark 11 Performance
9380 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
19473 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5951 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, 8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
81.4 fps ∼100% +57%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
69.8 fps ∼86% +35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼85% +34%
Dell G3 15 3579
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
65.4 fps ∼80% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (51.7 - 52.5, n=2)
52.1 fps ∼64% +1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
51.7 fps ∼64%
Asus GL552VW-DH74
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB
49.5 fps ∼61% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
35.2 fps ∼43% -32%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼100% +59%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, 8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
40.8 fps ∼95% +52%
Dell G3 15 3579
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
33 fps ∼77% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (26.9 - 32.8, n=2)
29.9 fps ∼70% +11%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
27.8 fps ∼65% +3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
26.9 fps ∼63%
Asus GL552VW-DH74
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB
25.2 fps ∼59% -6%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
18.5 fps ∼43% -31%
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 208177.315751.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 7940.821.513fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 80.23526.912fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high

Barulho

Ocioso
30.8 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB
Carga
31.8 / 44.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Vega M GL / 870, 8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
Noise
-2%
6%
5%
-5%
-4%
off / environment *
28.1
28
-0%
28.6
-2%
28.2
-0%
30
-7%
28.1
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30.8
28.6
7%
29.2
5%
28.2
8%
30
3%
29
6%
Idle Average *
30.9
29.9
3%
29.2
6%
28.2
9%
31
-0%
29
6%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
30.5
1%
29.2
6%
28.2
9%
34
-10%
29.2
6%
Load Average *
31.8
42.5
-34%
29.2
8%
29
9%
43
-35%
40.6
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.1
44.8
7%
38.4
20%
44.7
7%
42
13%
49.8
-4%
Load Maximum *
44.2
44.8
-1%
45.7
-3%
47.4
-7%
44
-0%
49.8
-13%

* ... smaller is better

 39.2 °C46.4 °C43.4 °C 
 34 °C42 °C35.2 °C 
 30.4 °C27 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
47.4 °C49.2 °C41.4 °C
40 °C41 °C38.2 °C
35.2 °C34.2 °C34 °C
Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.837.32536.337.23135354031.835.15032.433.76332.9328030.631.510030.130.112528.933.516027.941.920027.651.725026.958.731526.86340025.666.650025.165.563024.673.78002577.6100024.771.5125024.668.5160024.476.7200024.373.2250024.169.5315023.569400023.671.6500023.477.1630023.378.6800023.374.31000023.273.11250023.172.51600023.171.2SPL36.386.1N2.768.4median 24.6median 71.2Delta1.67.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Spectre x360 15-ch000Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.57 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 0.89 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11.7 / 16.8 / 18.9 Watt
Carga midlight 82.3 / 94.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
8705G, Vega M GL / 870, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
8705G, Vega M GL / 870, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Power Consumption
17%
30%
-23%
-14%
27%
Idle Minimum *
11.7
6.2
47%
5.3
55%
14.9
-27%
11.7
-0%
3.4
71%
Idle Average *
16.8
12.9
23%
9.8
42%
17.5
-4%
18.5
-10%
11
35%
Idle Maximum *
18.9
13.6
28%
12.6
33%
19.2
-2%
22.8
-21%
14.9
21%
Load Average *
82.3
76.1
8%
73
11%
103.2
-25%
97.5
-18%
78.9
4%
Load Maximum *
94.9
99.4
-5%
80
16%
132.7
-40%
111.1
-17%
91.2
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
87.2
84.3
3%
67.6
22%
123.1
-41%
102.9
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 06min
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 84 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 71 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime
27%
14%
86%
17%
78%
Reader / Idle
540
842
56%
673
25%
927
72%
WiFi v1.3
344
375
9%
420
22%
625
82%
402
17%
614
78%
Load
66
76
15%
63
-5%
135
105%
Witcher 3 ultra
88

Pro

+ Alto desempenho de CPU e GPU para um conversível
+ Excelente qualidade de construção, fortes primeiras impressões
+ 4K UHD e caneta WACOM vêm por padrão
+ Duas portas Thunderbolt 3
+ Teclas firmes
+ Ótima qualidade do áudio
+ Teclado numérico de tamanho normal

Contra

- Problemas moderados a graves de afogamento de desempenho durante os jogos
- Modulação de largura de pulso (PWM) em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao sensor de digitais na borda
- Ventiladores sensíveis; muito barulhento durante os jogos
- Capacidade de manutenção hostil ao usuário
- Duração de bateria mais curta
In review: HP Spectre x360 15-ch000. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King
In review: HP Spectre x360 15-ch000. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King

Um conversível de 15 polegadas é difícil de vender, simplesmente porque o grande tamanho da tela torna o modo tablet mais desconfortável em comparação com as opções menores. O HP Spectre x360 15 pode ser um pouco maior que o concorrente XPS 9575, mas seu design e qualidade se sentem incomparáveis em sua categoria.

Aprofunde-se no desempenho do Kaby Lake-G Spectre e o sistema começa a decepcionar quando comparado à configuração Kaby Lake-R. No papel, o Core i7-8705G e o Radeon RX Vega M GL devem ser significativamente mais rápidos que o i7-8550U e GeForce MX150. Na prática, no entanto, o SKU Kaby Lake-G sofre de problemas consideráveis de afogamento que, em última análise, mitigam grande parte das vantagens do desempenho que o chipset traz para a mesa. Os proprietários que pretendem usar o portátil principalmente para o processamento de texto, streaming ou navegação não perceberão o afogamento, mas o uso intenso contínuo e exigente como o de jogos, colocará o sistema de joelhos.

Os perfis de menor potência do i7-8550U e GeForce MX150 também funcionam em favor da menos cara configuração Kaby Lake-R. Nossa unidade Kaby Lake-G é geralmente mais barulhenta e com uma duração de bateria muito menor do que a versão Kaby Lake-R.

Se você planeja jogar muito ou é sensível a flickerings na tela, então seria melhor usar o XPS 15 9575 ou um portátil para jogos mainstream dedicado com gráficos GTX 1050 Ti se a funcionalidade 2-em-1 for de pouco interesse. Se a navegação e a multimídia leve forem sua intenção, o Kaby Lake-R Spectre será mais que suficiente.

O Kaby Lake-G é uma peça impressionante de tecnologia como provado pelo Intel Hades Canyon NUCe Dell XPS 15 9575. O Spectre x360 15 é a implementação menos impressionante do chipset que vimos até agora. Se você quiser Kaby Lake-G, então o equivalente da Dell é a melhor opção. Caso contrário, poupe-se dos problemas de afogamento de desempenho indo para as configuração Kaby Lake-R Spectre x360 15 mais econômica e mais estável.

HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 - 08/20/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
89 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
69 / 81 → 85%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 90%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
80 / 85 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
91 / 92 → 99%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
63%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Médio
77%
86%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15 (i7-8705G, Radeon RX Vega M GL)
Allen Ngo, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09- 8)