Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 (i7-7600U, FHD Sure View)

Spectre Elite. O EliteBook 1020 G2 é um ótimo exemplo da fusão entre designs de consumidores elegantes e configurações de negócios com grandes recursos. É inegavelmente mais rápido e mais fino do que o 1020 G1, mas não sem alguns recortes que os proprietários de EliteBook de longa data podem lamentar.

HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 (EliteBook x360 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, 21.20.16.4627
Memória
16384 MB 
, LPDDR3-1866, Dual-Channel, 14-17-17-40, Soldered
Pantalha
12.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, ID: IVO04E8, Name: M125NVF6 R0, IPS, Sure View, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Accelerometer, HP DriveLock
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.9 x 290 x 203.8
Bateria
49 Wh, 4-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 5 speakers, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Quick Start guide, Instructions booklet, Warranty card, WACOM pen, 3x extra WACOM pen tips, attachable pen loop, USB Type-C to RJ-45 adapter, AAAA battery, String tie, HP Client Security, Alps Touchpad, HP Sure Click, B&O Audio, HP Velocity, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.111 kg, Suprimento de energia: 312 g
Preço
2200 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Volume rocker, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI 1.4a
Right: Volume rocker, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI 1.4a
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: 3.5 mm combo audio, HP DriveLock, Power button
Left: 3.5 mm combo audio, HP DriveLock, Power button
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
562 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
580 MBit/s ∼94% +24%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
469 MBit/s ∼76%
658.9
cd/m²
666.4
cd/m²
682.2
cd/m²
618.7
cd/m²
677.4
cd/m²
680.7
cd/m²
630.3
cd/m²
712.9
cd/m²
727.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 727.9 cd/m² Médio: 672.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.89 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 677.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 880:1 (Preto: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.8-23.34 Ø6.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.7
89.6% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.1
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
ID: IVO04E8, Name: M125NVF6 R0, IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
AUO226D, IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, IGZO IPS, 13.3, 3200x1800
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1824
Dell Latitude 5280
TN LED, 12.5, 1366x768
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U
IPS IGZO, 12.5, 3840x2160
Response Times
11%
370%
389%
-3%
-60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.4 (18, 16.4)
32 (14.8, 17.2)
7%
29 (19, 10)
16%
42 (20, 22)
-22%
42 (21.2, 20.8)
-22%
63.2 (27.6, 35.6)
-84%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (15.6, 12.4)
24 (12.4, 11.6)
14%
30 (18, 12)
-7%
29 (18, 11)
-4%
23.2 (17.2, 6)
17%
38 (8, 30)
-36%
PWM Frequency
1623 (99)
19500 (100)
1101%
21000
1194%
Screen
-26%
-35%
6%
-136%
2%
Brightness
673
298
-56%
303
-55%
401
-40%
246
-63%
399
-41%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
72
-15%
88
4%
90
6%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.77
0.27
65%
0.33
57%
0.29
62%
0.75
3%
0.309
60%
Contrast
880
1070
22%
1094
24%
1438
63%
336
-62%
1343
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.24
4.82
-115%
5.26
-135%
3.63
-62%
11.3
-404%
3.78
-69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.84
-75%
5.69
-159%
2.18
1%
13.2
-500%
3.38
-54%
Gamma
2.1 114%
2.41 100%
1.63 147%
3.09 78%
2.05 117%
2.23 108%
CCT
6821 95%
6492 100%
6499 100%
6767 96%
14912 44%
7329 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
42.03
-26%
59
4%
63
11%
37.6
-34%
85.1
49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.6
64.8
-28%
92
3%
99
10%
59.2
-34%
99.3
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -19%
168% / 76%
198% / 111%
-70% / -109%
-29% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1623 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1623 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1623 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8615 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points ∼85% +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼81% 0%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
161 Points ∼81% 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
161 Points ∼81%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼73% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points ∼71% -12%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
137 Points ∼69% -15%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
131 Points ∼66% -19%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼65% -19%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
126 Points ∼63% -22%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points ∼56% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼34% +107%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
576 Points ∼27% +63%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
574 Points ∼27% +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35) Points ∼19% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
367 Points ∼17% +4%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
359 Points ∼17% +2%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
353 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
327 Points ∼15% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
308 Points ∼14% -13%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
296 Points ∼14% -16%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
272 Points ∼13% -23%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel Core m5-6Y54
250 Points ∼12% -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.91 Points ∼84% +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
1.89 Points ∼83% +28%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.86 Points ∼82% +26%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼81% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.61 Points ∼71% +9%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.53 Points ∼67% +3%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
1.5 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points ∼65% 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.48 Points ∼65%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
1.46 Points ∼64% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.19 Points ∼52% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼3% +104%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.46 Points ∼3% +63%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.94 Points ∼2% +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
4.55 Points ∼2% +15%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.96 Points ∼2%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.92 Points ∼2% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.4 Points ∼1% -14%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
3.26 Points ∼1% -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.25 Points ∼1% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.15 Points ∼1% -20%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
2.92 Points ∼1% -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
6452 Points ∼73% +25%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
6283 Points ∼71% +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
6213 Points ∼70% +21%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5920 Points ∼67% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
5595 Points ∼63% +9%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
5145 Points ∼58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
5085 Points ∼57% -1%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
4940 Points ∼56% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4904 Points ∼55% -5%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
4632 Points ∼52% -10%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4103 Points ∼46% -20%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22033 Points ∼44% +95%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
15599 Points ∼31% +38%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
14400 Points ∼29% +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
13838 Points ∼28% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
12799 Points ∼26% +13%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
12482 Points ∼25% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
11324 Points ∼23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
10897 Points ∼22% -4%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
10271 Points ∼21% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
9140 Points ∼18% -19%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
8924 Points ∼18% -21%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
613.407 s * ∼7% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
525.775 s * ∼6% -21%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
482.056 s * ∼6% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
473.575 s * ∼6% -9%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
445.8 s * ∼5% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
438 s * ∼5% -0%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
436.057 s * ∼5%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
377.99 s * ∼4% +13%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
322.2 s * ∼4% +26%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
251.078 s * ∼3% +42%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
684.933 Seconds * ∼3% -20%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-B1320W10
Intel Core i7-5600U
636.329 Seconds * ∼3% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
609.647 Seconds * ∼3% -7%
HP EliteBook 840 G1
Intel Core i7-4600U
595.952 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
594.092 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
571.795 Seconds * ∼3%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
547.68 Seconds * ∼2% +4%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
543 Seconds * ∼2% +5%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
536 Seconds * ∼2% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7930
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11324
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5145
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
38.75 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
42.77 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
353 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4880 Points ∼75%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4431 Points ∼68% -9%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4146 Points ∼64% -15%
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4092 Points ∼63% -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
3586 Points ∼55% -27%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
5540 Points ∼58% +12%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4931 Points ∼52%
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4501 Points ∼47% -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
3754 Points ∼39% -24%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3430 Points ∼36% -30%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4095 Points ∼69% +11%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3684 Points ∼62%
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3186 Points ∼53% -14%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3037 Points ∼51% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
2896 Points ∼48% -21%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3684 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4931 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4880 pontos
Ajuda
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
AS SSD
-24%
-31%
-239%
-36%
Copy Game MB/s
904.9
582.29
-36%
582
-36%
390.03
-57%
Copy Program MB/s
323.73
294.98
-9%
386
19%
188.02
-42%
Copy ISO MB/s
1434.67
754.22
-47%
1036
-28%
283.3
-80%
Score Total
3738
2195
-41%
1202
-68%
1774
-53%
1607
-57%
Score Write
1122
491
-56%
474
-58%
52
-95%
327
-71%
Score Read
1757
1147
-35%
472
-73%
1164
-34%
870
-50%
Access Time Write *
0.26
0.297
-14%
0.035
87%
7.6
-2823%
0.035
87%
Access Time Read *
0.39
0.049
87%
0.05
87%
0.04
90%
0.055
86%
4K-64 Write
878.07
304.02
-65%
330.8
-62%
34
-96%
197.7
-77%
4K-64 Read
1505.83
937.94
-38%
377.96
-75%
1015
-33%
722.85
-52%
4K Write
141.08
80.87
-43%
95.79
-32%
0.2
-100%
91.98
-35%
4K Read
54.36
35.58
-35%
43
-21%
41
-25%
29.52
-46%
Seq Write
1031.59
1060.97
3%
472.79
-54%
171
-83%
372.76
-64%
Seq Read
1964.03
1731.05
-12%
512.41
-74%
1070
-46%
1179.3
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3112 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 1572 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 426.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 436.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1351 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1520 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 44.08 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 142.4 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2918 Points ∼17% +83%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2387 Points ∼14% +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2184 Points ∼12% +37%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼10% +15%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1595 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1488 Points ∼8% -7%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1322 Points ∼8% -17%
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1203 Points ∼7% -25%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1176.5 (min: 1172) Points ∼7% -26%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1086 Points ∼6% -32%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3602 Points ∼7% +116%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2524 Points ∼5% +52%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2493 Points ∼5% +50%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +27%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1666 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1633 Points ∼3% -2%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1617 Points ∼3% -3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1254 Points ∼2% -25%
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1222 Points ∼2% -27%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1195 (min: 1195) Points ∼2% -28%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2460 Points ∼6% +129%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1520 Points ∼4% +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1418 Points ∼3% +32%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% +28%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1073 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1030 Points ∼3% -4%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
926 Points ∼2% -14%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
853 Points ∼2% -21%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
844 Points ∼2% -21%
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
708 Points ∼2% -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
16285 Points ∼9% +80%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
12812 Points ∼7% +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
11264 Points ∼6% +25%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼6% +24%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
9023 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8631 Points ∼5% -4%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
7794 Points ∼4% -14%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
7035 Points ∼4% -22%
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6384 Points ∼3% -29%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
6360 Points ∼3% -30%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
82506 Points ∼11% +70%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
48428 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
44622 Points ∼6% -8%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
40760 Points ∼6% -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
1842 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
70030 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7131 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
980 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
446 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 58.731.925.98.1fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 19.8fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.3 / 28.3 / 29.3 dB
Carga
32.2 / 34.5 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Noise
-9%
-3%
-7%
-0%
off / environment *
28.3
29.6
-5%
30.4
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
30
-6%
29.6
-5%
30.4
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Average *
28.3
30.5
-8%
29.6
-5%
30.4
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Maximum *
29.3
31.1
-6%
29.6
-1%
30.4
-4%
29.5
-1%
Load Average *
32.2
35.9
-11%
33.4
-4%
38.3
-19%
30.6
5%
Load Maximum *
34.5
39.5
-14%
34.1
1%
33.6
3%
32.5
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
33.4

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C42.6 °C36.6 °C 
 30.4 °C38 °C30.8 °C 
 26 °C24 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 32 °C
31.6 °C46.2 °C32.6 °C
29.4 °C36.2 °C30.4 °C
26.4 °C27.2 °C26.8 °C
Máximo: 46.2 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203642.72531.835.23132.435.54031.733.85030.233.36330.132.88029.532.11002934.212527.547.616026.361.120026.565.12502669.431524.171.14002468.250023.165.963022.564.180021.771.710002168.412502172.1160021.374.220002172.6250020.678.1315020.774.8400020.474.4500020.571.7630020.772.8800020.872.41000020.868.91250020.9631600021.161.3SPL33.585.3N266median 21.1HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2median 69.4Delta2.25.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.7 / 0.78 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.4 / 7.5 / 11.1 Watt
Carga midlight 37.6 / 37.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP, , 1366x768, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, , 3200x1800, 13.3
Power Consumption
19%
24%
-15%
-3%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
3.4
4.3
-26%
2
41%
4.2
-24%
3.6
-6%
5.6
-65%
Idle Average *
7.5
6
20%
5.9
21%
10.1
-35%
7.9
-5%
7.5
-0%
Idle Maximum *
11.1
6.4
42%
8.5
23%
14
-26%
8.5
23%
8.4
24%
Load Average *
37.6
22.7
40%
30.4
19%
37.4
1%
43
-14%
33.7
10%
Load Maximum *
37.6
31.2
17%
31.1
17%
34
10%
43
-14%
34.6
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.1
31

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 49min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 14min
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh
HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1
5Y51, HD Graphics 5300, 36 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Dell Latitude 5280
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Battery Runtime
0%
-4%
35%
-13%
18%
Reader / Idle
769
660
-14%
1092
42%
526
-32%
1112
45%
WiFi v1.3
448
412
-8%
489
9%
689
54%
355
-21%
470
5%
Load
134
164
22%
112
-16%
146
9%
152
13%
138
3%
Witcher 3 ultra
115

Pro

+ Muito leve e portável; atraente design inspirado no Spectre 2-em-1
+ Base e tampa relativamente fortes, considerando o tamanho; certificação MIL-STD
+ Longa lista de recursos de segurança acima e abaixo do SO
+ Luz de fundo extremamente brilhante; boa visibilidade em exteriores
+ Temperaturas da superfície respeitáveis sob uso intenso
+ Excelente qualidade de som para o tamanho; alto-falantes potentes
+ Manutenção relativamente fácil; SSD atualizável
+ SSD PCIe x4 Samsung veloz, 2x Thunderbolt 3
+ Desempenho de CPU consistente; sem afogamentos
+ Sure View e NFC opcionais
+ Resposta satisfatória das teclas
+ Ruído baixo da ventoinha

Contra

- O Sure View interfere com contraste e cores; não tão eficaz para trabalhos de navegação ou de edição gráfica
- Sem teclas de mouse dedicadas ou TrackPoint; Caneta WACOM não incluída na embalagem
- Ângulos de visão mais estreitos para um brilho ótimo devido à presença do painel Sure View
- Sem RJ-45 integrado, porta docking VGA, leitor SD, SIM, ou USB Type-A
- Propriedades de deslizamento do trackpad menos do que perfeitas; os dedos tendem a grudar
- O design super fino não é tão rígido quando o de alternativas EliteBook mais finas
- PWM em todos os níveis de brilho, exceto no máximo
- Ventoinha barulhenta sob uso intenso
- Sem opções Kaby Lake-R ou gráficos Iris
- Bleeding moderado da iluminação de fundo
- Leve ruído eletrônico ou de bobina
- Turbo Boost da CPU não sustentável
- Ainda sem opção 4K UHD 120 Hz
In review: HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 2UES1UT#ABA. Test model provided by HP
In review: HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 2UES1UT#ABA. Test model provided by HP

Há muito do que gostar  no EliteBook x360 1020 G2. As maiores falhas são talvez a sua forte filosofia de design conversível inspirado no Spectre, tela super brilhante que é mais brilhante do que qualquer portátil  de consumidor disponível e um modo de tablet que seja realmente leve e não pesado quando está em movimento. A qualidade de áudio forte e equilibrada e a resposta do teclado satisfatório são vantagens muito surpreendentes que provam que tais características não precisam ser prejudicadas por design menores. Apreciamos que a HP não tenha ignorado os recursos de segurança, apesar do foco em um perfil mais fino e elegante. Combine isso com opções de tela Sure View de 4K UHD e FHD 120 Hz e o 1020 G2 torna-se facilmente um conversível de negócios único.

Por mais único que possa ser na categoria de subportáteis empresariais conversíveis, o 1020 G2 está longe de ser perfeito. Há uma lista de recursos omitidos e outras estranhezas, conforme mostrado na nossa lista de Pros e Contras, que os potenciais compradores devem ter em mente. A sua seleção de portas continua a ser muito limitada e é difícil ignorar para um portátil de classe empresarial.

Em um nível mais profundo, a tela exibe algumas desvantagens notáveis, apesar da sua fachada muito brilhante. Por um lado, o grau de bleeding da luz de fundo é muito alto para um sistema carro-chefe nesta faixa de preços, dado que é algo que esperaríamos de em um portátil de consumo de orçamento. Em segundo lugar, o PWM está presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho para potencialmente afastar os usuários que são sensíveis à cintilação na tela. A luz de fundo muito brilhante realmente exacerba esse problema, pois a tela estaria cintilante em intensidades mais brilhantes do que a maioria dos outros portáteis. Por fim, a tela é um pouco granulada para um painel refletivo e o brilho aparente cai bruscamente se não estiver sentado diretamente na frente da tela. Em comparação, as telas do Surface Pro e do Miix 520 parecem mais nítidas e sem problemas de uniformidade de brilho independentemente da orientação. Não temos certeza se isso é devido à camada Sure View ou se os SKUs sem Sure View também sofrem com essas mesmas anomalias, e é algo que investigaremos ainda mais através de SKUs adicionais.

Nossa lista de desejos para o EliteBook x360 1020 G2 sucessor é curta, mas justificável. USB Type-A, MicroSD, 4G LTE, 4K UHD 120 Hz, tela táctil mate e Kaby Lake-R ou Iris Pro impulsionariam a série acima e além do Surface Pro, MacBook 12XPS 13 9365, e Latitude 7280. Abordar o PWM e avançando para os ventiladores de diâmetro maior afetariam menos usuários que talvez fossem mais sensíveis ao cintilamento e ao ruído agudo do ventilador. Até então, este é o melhor subportátil conversível Windows disponível em termos de visibilidade em exteriores, tactilidade, qualidade de som e segurança.

O EliteBook x360 1020 G2 possui recursos de tela não encontrados em nenhum outro portátil empresarial, incluindo a opção para um painel brilhante de 120 Hz 700 nit. Existem algumas características estranhas em relação ao brilho em certos ângulos de visão e uma tela refletiva ligeiramente granulada. No entanto, os usuários que estão acostumados a transportar dongles e adaptadores e podem explorar o modo tablet e a tela muito brilhante não serão decepcionados por esta máquina empresarial reconhecidamente atraente.

HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 - 12/21/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
91 /  98 → 93%
Teclado
91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
50 / 80 → 63%
Peso
74 / 78 → 90%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
96%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
78%
89%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 (i7-7600U, FHD Sure View)
Allen Ngo, 2017-12-23 (Update: 2018-01- 4)