Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 330 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/22/2018

Afogamento pesado. O portátil impulsionado por Ryzen está a partir de apenas $330, com opções até a Ryzen 7 2700U e tela FHD. Infelizmente, o afogamento da CPU significa que os proprietários não se beneficiarão do desempenho total do hardware.

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS (IdeaPad 330 Serie)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 - 256 MB, Análises do: 1101 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 23.20.822.3584
Memória
8192 MB 
, 4 GB DDR4 soldado + 4 GB PC4-21300, 17-17-17-39, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HTN03.8, TN LED, AUO38ED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
0 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SD, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidade ótica
HP DVD-RW DA8AESH
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.9 x 378 x 260
Bateria
35 Wh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 x 1.5 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Norton Anti-Virus, Lenovo Utility, Lenovo Vantage, Power2Go, Power2DVD, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 162 g
Preço
570 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

379.5 mm 254 mm 22.1 mm 2.1 kg378 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg361 mm 244 mm 19.4 mm 1.6 kg361.7 mm 245.6 mm 17.8 mm 1.8 kg359 mm 245 mm 17 mm 1.7 kg358 mm 239 mm 16.9 mm 1.8 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.2 MB/s ∼100%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.6 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.35 MB/s ∼76% -24%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.56 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.95 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.2 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
652 MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼99% +91%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
338 MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼100% +126%
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
516 MBit/s ∼97% +121%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
234 MBit/s ∼44%
226.8
cd/m²
252.3
cd/m²
263.9
cd/m²
228.3
cd/m²
252.2
cd/m²
251.7
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
268.7
cd/m²
264.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 268.7 cd/m² Médio: 251.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.99 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 252.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 467:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.36 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.43
ΔE Greyscale 12.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
54.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 34.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.83
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AUO B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
LG Philips LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-17%
5%
2%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.8 (20, 18.8)
36.4 (18.4, 18)
6%
43.6 (20, 23.6)
-12%
27.2 (13.2, 14)
30%
37.2 (19.6, 17.6)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
19.6 (15.6, 4)
27.2 (15.6, 11.6)
-39%
15.2 (10, 5.2)
22%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
-27%
32.4 (18.4, 14)
-65%
PWM Frequency
25770 (67)
Screen
29%
10%
27%
34%
Brightness middle
252.2
265.7
5%
220.1
-13%
257
2%
285.1
13%
Brightness
251
258
3%
210
-16%
246
-2%
271
8%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
93
11%
89
6%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.54
0.31
43%
0.29
46%
0.34
37%
0.28
48%
Contrast
467
857
84%
759
63%
756
62%
1018
118%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.36
6.01
51%
11.4
8%
4.54
63%
4.38
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
24.75
18.87
24%
25.96
-5%
16
35%
24.07
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.43
3.94
11%
4.09
8%
3.61
19%
3.95
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.2
5
59%
12
2%
4.6
62%
3.1
75%
Gamma
1.83 120%
2.7 81%
2.09 105%
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
CCT
13028 50%
6569 99%
12625 51%
7096 92%
6705 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
34.6
42.24
22%
36.5
5%
37.5
8%
40
16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
54.5
60.92
12%
57.5
6%
59.2
9%
62
14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 22%
8% / 10%
15% / 23%
2% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9654 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
154 Points ∼71% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼67% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
141 Points ∼65% +12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points ∼65% +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (124 - 142, n=14)
136 Points ∼62% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
135 Points ∼62% +7%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
127 Points ∼58% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
126 Points ∼58%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
107 Points ∼49% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
687 Points ∼16% +35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
608 Points ∼14% +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (510 - 642, n=15)
597 Points ∼14% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
530 Points ∼12% +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
514 Points ∼12% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
510 Points ∼12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
499 Points ∼11% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
367 Points ∼8% -28%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points ∼7% -38%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
306 Points ∼7% -40%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.61 Points ∼66%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1.58 Points ∼65%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (1.53 - 1.61, n=4)
1.578 Points ∼65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.56 Points ∼64%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.16 Points ∼48%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
0.85 Points ∼35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (5.71 - 6.91, n=4)
6.48 Points ∼24%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
5.88 Points ∼22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.47 Points ∼20%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.56 Points ∼13%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.4 Points ∼13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
2.68 Points ∼10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
5595 Points ∼52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
5510 Points ∼51%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
4779 Points ∼44%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
4515 Points ∼42%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (4103 - 4473, n=5)
4369 Points ∼40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
3729 Points ∼34%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
16043 Points ∼32%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (13850 - 16466, n=5)
15217 Points ∼31%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
13729 Points ∼28%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
12799 Points ∼26%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
9158 Points ∼18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
6745 Points ∼14%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
521.22 s * ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
473.575 s * ∼6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (251 - 376, n=2)
313 s * ∼4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
306.16 s * ∼4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
268.14 s * ∼3%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (2.2 - 5873, n=18)
982 Seconds * ∼4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
763 Seconds * ∼3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
697.5 Seconds * ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
645.84 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga-20LH000LUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
612.41 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
594.092 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
510 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.05 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3904 Points ∼50% +36%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3643 Points ∼47% +26%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
3250 Points ∼42% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2501 - 3685, n=11)
3144 Points ∼40% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
2881 Points ∼37%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
GeForce MX130, 8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
2801 Points ∼36% -3%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4894 Points ∼75% +42%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4769 Points ∼73% +39%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
4762 Points ∼73% +39%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
4654 Points ∼71% +35%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3437 - 4870, n=10)
4187 Points ∼64% +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
3437 Points ∼53%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3889 Points ∼64% +28%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
GeForce MX130, 8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
3704 Points ∼61% +21%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
3675 Points ∼60% +21%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3585 Points ∼59% +18%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3461 Points ∼57% +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3049 - 3550, n=13)
3341 Points ∼55% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
3049 Points ∼50%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3049 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3437 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN)
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
AS SSD
80%
-8%
-120%
143%
Copy Game MB/s
262.37
301.11
15%
221.74
-15%
56.84
-78%
683.66
161%
Copy Program MB/s
334.05
233.52
-30%
174.36
-48%
38.74
-88%
495.65
48%
Copy ISO MB/s
434.45
868.11
100%
262.54
-40%
60.7
-86%
1013.34
133%
Score Total
752
1387
84%
727
-3%
135
-82%
2123
182%
Score Write
295
415
41%
275
-7%
48
-84%
832
182%
Score Read
296
690
133%
297
0%
54
-82%
860
191%
Access Time Write *
0.08
0.051
36%
0.072
10%
0.575
-619%
0.051
36%
Access Time Read *
0.102
0.06
41%
0.078
24%
0.228
-124%
0.045
56%
4K-64 Write
203.63
271.59
33%
187.03
-8%
25.33
-88%
611.98
201%
4K-64 Read
228.53
431.26
89%
231.83
1%
23.97
-90%
659.92
189%
4K Write
45.41
88.45
95%
49.43
9%
10.55
-77%
99.47
119%
4K Read
23.4
38.69
65%
20.27
-13%
14.01
-40%
40.59
73%
Seq Write
459.6
549.75
20%
384.73
-16%
124.7
-73%
1209.39
163%
Seq Read
441.59
2205.34
399%
448.11
1%
160.78
-64%
1595.69
261%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 537 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 481.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 202.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 197 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 525.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 465.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 66.59 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3851 Points ∼17% +213%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2831 Points ∼13% +130%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2734 Points ∼12% +122%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
2683 Points ∼12% +118%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1232 - 3871, n=19)
2454 Points ∼11% +99%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2395 Points ∼11% +94%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1232 Points ∼5%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
385 Points ∼2% -69%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3833 Points ∼8% +67%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
3728 Points ∼7% +63%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=19)
3265 Points ∼6% +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
3044 Points ∼6% +33%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2613 Points ∼5% +14%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2592 Points ∼5% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2294 Points ∼4%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
348 Points ∼1% -85%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2442 Points ∼6% +105%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
2323 Points ∼6% +95%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2149 Points ∼5% +80%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=17)
2072 Points ∼5% +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
2070 Points ∼5% +74%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2069 Points ∼5% +74%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1284 Points ∼3% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1192 Points ∼3%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
18946 Points ∼10% +86%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
15613 Points ∼8% +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
14343 Points ∼8% +41%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7309 - 19351, n=17)
13863 Points ∼8% +36%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
12942 Points ∼7% +27%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
10816 Points ∼6% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
10177 Points ∼6%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
10131 Points ∼5% 0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (59083 - 74203, n=5)
65822 Points ∼9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
39557 Points ∼5%
3DMark 11 Performance
2241 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7161 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1066 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 68.97.6fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 22fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031Tooltip
The Witcher 3 low

Barulho

Ocioso
28.1 / 31.6 / 32.8 dB
Carga
36.5 / 32.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
GeForce MX130, 8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Noise
6%
-11%
-1%
-16%
off / environment *
28.1
28
-0%
27.8
1%
28.2
-0%
28.5
-1%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
28
-0%
29.4
-5%
31.7
-13%
30.8
-10%
Idle Average *
31.6
28
11%
29.6
6%
31.7
-0%
30.8
3%
Idle Maximum *
32.8
30.1
8%
29.6
10%
32
2%
31
5%
Load Average *
36.5
30.2
17%
43.5
-19%
32.8
10%
45.6
-25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
32.8
43.5
-33%
45.6
-39%
Load Maximum *
32.8
33.2
-1%
45.8
-40%
35
-7%
46.7
-42%

* ... smaller is better

 32.4 °C32.8 °C27.8 °C 
 36.8 °C33.4 °C27 °C 
 34 °C29.4 °C27.4 °C 
Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C
27.4 °C29.4 °C30.2 °C
27.4 °C36.6 °C42 °C
27.4 °C29.2 °C35.8 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203838.52534.8373133.734.3403335.15032.832.26336.332.18031.131.410030.631.512528.931.716028.632.420028.439.125027.649.631526.957.540026.856.250026.653.763025.762.180025.665.710002561.4125025.767.2160025.666200025.263.4250024.165.3315023.762.3400023.765.2500023.270.3630023.266.5800023.263100002370.31250022.970.11600022.961.5SPL36.878N2.841.3median 25.6median 62.3Delta2.37.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUSApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.27 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.6 / 10.6 / 11.8 Watt
Carga midlight 24.1 / 39.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
8550U, GeForce MX130, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
20%
-27%
16%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
7.6
3.5
54%
4.2
45%
5.6
26%
5.9
22%
Idle Average *
10.6
5.6
47%
7.2
32%
7.1
33%
7
34%
Idle Maximum *
11.8
10.3
13%
12.1
-3%
7.9
33%
8.5
28%
Load Average *
24.1
30.5
-27%
51.1
-112%
32.8
-36%
54.5
-126%
Load Maximum *
39.4
33.8
14%
59.9
-52%
30.5
23%
55.7
-41%
Witcher 3 ultra *
30.3
52.7
-74%
50.6
-67%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 57min
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
2500U, Vega 8, 35 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ
8250U, GeForce MX150, 43.3 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
8550U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
65%
95%
77%
-2%
Reader / Idle
910
722
WiFi v1.3
237
391
65%
462
95%
419
77%
232
-2%
Load
74
134

Pro

+ As superfícies mate escondem as digitais
+ Ventilador com ruído de alta frequência
+ Unidade ótica
+ Econômico
+ USB Tipo C

Contra

- Afogamento pesado do desempenho
- Tela muito imprecisa
- Trackpad esponjoso
- Curta duração da bateria
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS

O Ideapad 330 de 15 polegadas é uma solução multimídia barata e, portanto, não esperamos muito do sistema. Seu chassi é suave, se não brando, e seu painel mate é ótimo para reduzir o brilho. É também um dos poucos portáteis fornecidos com USB Type-C e uma unidade óptica para usuários que possam querer eles numa máquina.

Ainda há uma longa lista de qualidades decepcionantes, apesar do baixo preço pedido. O equilíbrio de cores e RGB de fábrica é péssimo, portanto, a calibração do usuário final é recomendável para uma experiência geral melhor, especialmente ao reproduzir vídeos. O afogamento é severo em quase 41%, de acordo com nosso teste de loop CineBench R15. Assim, enquanto o Ryzen 5 2500U é uma poderosa alternativa da Intel no papel, os proprietários do Lenovo não se beneficiarão totalmente do processador AMD quando estiverem jogando ou sob altas cargas. O SKU mais caro com o mais potente Ryzen 7 2700U poderia ser potencialmente uma compra ruim, já que a nossa configuração menos exigente do Ryzen 5 2500U já está sobrecarregada. A duração da bateria também é curta, o que torna o Ideapad 330 um companheiro de viagem ruim.

Para revisões futuras, esperamos ver o carregamento USB Type-C em vez do adaptador CA proprietário e talvez outra porta USB tipo A na borda direita. Uma tela mais brilhante, maior tempo de duração da bateria e redução do afogamento de desempenho também ajudariam a melhorar essa máquina. A recente atualização do HP Pavilion 15 é a opção mais potente, em geral, para a mesma faixa de preço.

Existem algumas noções básicas que o Ideapad 330 poderia ter feito melhor sem aumentar o preço acessível. Uma tela melhor calibrada, controles manuais do ventilador para o streaming silencioso, redução do afogamento do desempenho e uma porta USB Type-A na borda direita poderiam ter feito do Ideapad 330 uma compra mais fácil pelo preço. Tal como está, o sistema é meramente mediano.

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS - 09/20/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
44%
Conectividade
39 / 80 → 49%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Bateria
75%
Pantalha
77%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 92 → 85%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
92%
Audio
55%
Camera
32 / 85 → 37%
Médio
66%
74%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 330 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U)
Allen Ngo, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)