Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB70RC/PB71RC)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/03/2019

Um Clevo de manutenção difícil. O Nightsky RX17 de tamanho médio oferece um desempenho de jogos de alta qualidade, como seria de esperar de um produto da Eurocom. Infelizmente, ele deixa de lado o único recurso que torna outros portáteis de jogos da Eurocom tão atraentes para os entusiastas e criadores.

Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1315 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3000, PC4-24000, 18-18-18-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, BOE07B6, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: Leitor SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.9 x 399 x 275
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo de 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Control Center 3.0, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.9 kg, Suprimento de energia: 826 g
Preço
2900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

418 mm 287 mm 24.9 mm 3 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 275 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg
Front: SD card reader (underneath)
Front: SD card reader (underneath)
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.3, USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-A, AC adapter
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.3, USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-A, AC adapter
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.5 MB/s ∼100%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
183 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.6 MB/s ∼33% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
219.1 MB/s ∼100%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼99% +12%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼94% +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s ∼98% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼93% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
634 MBit/s ∼91%
282.1
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
278.3
cd/m²
290.2
cd/m²
298.4
cd/m²
287.8
cd/m²
272.3
cd/m²
303.4
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV173FHM-N44
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 303.4 cd/m² Médio: 287 cd/m² Minimum: 18.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 995:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.58 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Eurocom Q8
AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
34%
32%
846%
-10%
-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 (8.4, 8)
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
59%
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
56%
7.6 (3.8, 3.8)
54%
21.6 (12.4, 9.2)
-32%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (6, 4.4)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
8%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
8%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
8%
9 (6.8, 2.2)
13%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-23%
PWM Frequency
990.1 (99)
25510 (17)
2477%
Screen
4%
17%
26%
-74%
-22%
Brightness middle
298.4
299.3
0%
288
-3%
355
19%
367.9
23%
299.1
0%
Brightness
287
294
2%
287
0%
327
14%
346
21%
273
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
91
1%
85
-6%
84
-7%
81
-10%
Black Level *
0.3
0.29
3%
0.2
33%
0.26
13%
0.55
-83%
0.27
10%
Contrast
995
1032
4%
1440
45%
1365
37%
669
-33%
1108
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.58
2.55
29%
2.33
35%
1.54
57%
9.86
-175%
5.07
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.29
4.73
25%
5.34
15%
3
52%
17.56
-179%
10.55
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.82
2.9
-3%
2.47
12%
0.77
73%
4.43
-57%
3.31
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.5
-13%
1.19
62%
2.19
29%
12.4
-300%
6.8
-119%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.41 91%
2.42 91%
2.09 105%
2.46 89%
CCT
7064 92%
7101 92%
6710 97%
6893 94%
11064 59%
7805 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.2
57
-5%
57
-5%
61
1%
52.5
-13%
58.5
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.7
88.7
-4%
88
-5%
95
2%
80.5
-13%
89.9
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 8%
25% / 20%
436% / 202%
-42% / -64%
-16% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990.1 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13646 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300Tooltip
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1137 (1123.56-1298.49)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Medion Erazer X15805 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1197 (1182.87-1216.55)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼97% +22%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points ∼95% +19%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points ∼93% +17%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
202 Points ∼93% +16%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
191 Points ∼88% +10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=72)
183 Points ∼84% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼83% +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼80%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼78% -2%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼77% -3%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼66% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points ∼46% +55%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +32%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points ∼32% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H
1306 Points ∼30%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points ∼28% -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points ∼27% -9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼27% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=74)
1180 Points ∼27% -10%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1099 Points ∼25% -16%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼20% -34%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
815 Points ∼19% -38%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points ∼89%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=7)
2.09 Points ∼85%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼69%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points ∼67%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
0.65 Points ∼26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points ∼35%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=7)
12.8 Points ∼29%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼22%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
7.4 Points ∼17%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7735 Points ∼71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=11)
6895 Points ∼64%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6566 Points ∼61%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points ∼60%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points ∼44%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
2682 Points ∼25%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
36591 Points ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=11)
33203 Points ∼51%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points ∼51%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
26081 Points ∼40%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
23118 Points ∼35%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points ∼32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
1896.87 s * ∼22%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.075 s * ∼2%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
179.449 s * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.722 s * ∼1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.3 - 11365, n=39)
2593 Seconds * ∼12%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
1248.27 Seconds * ∼6%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
649.703 Seconds * ∼3%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
503.822 Seconds * ∼2%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
490.548 Seconds * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1306 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
148.24 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points ∼65% +8%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8110 Points ∼63% +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7838 Points ∼61%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points ∼56% -8%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
6938 Points ∼54% -11%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4791 - 7838, n=5)
6801 Points ∼53% -13%
Productivity
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8515 Points ∼82% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7457 - 7987, n=5)
7633 Points ∼73% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7554 Points ∼73%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points ∼72% -1%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7462 Points ∼72% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points ∼71% -2%
Essentials
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
9972 Points ∼87% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
9812 Points ∼86%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points ∼84% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8912 - 9812, n=5)
9375 Points ∼82% -4%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
9233 Points ∼81% -6%
Score
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6331 Points ∼78% +6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼75% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5982 Points ∼74%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼71% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5013 - 5982, n=5)
5622 Points ∼69% -6%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5605 Points ∼69% -6%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points ∼89% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5697 - 5764, n=3)
5727 Points ∼87% 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5721 Points ∼87%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼86% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5111 Points ∼84% +16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points ∼84% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4402 - 4860, n=3)
4574 Points ∼75% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼72% 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4402 Points ∼72%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4402 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5721 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Eurocom Q8
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
-12%
-2%
-11%
-26%
Copy Game MB/s
1494.45
554.5
-63%
958.2
-36%
1161.79
-22%
Copy Program MB/s
591.62
425.46
-28%
406.67
-31%
608.24
3%
Copy ISO MB/s
2514.1
2086.06
-17%
1596.18
-37%
1487.13
-41%
Score Total
4235
4197
-1%
4123
-3%
3840
-9%
2784
-34%
Score Write
1640
1977
21%
1558
-5%
1579
-4%
1441
-12%
Score Read
1694
1468
-13%
1708
1%
1515
-11%
878
-48%
Access Time Write *
0.09
0.037
59%
0.039
57%
0.035
61%
0.04
56%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.064
-60%
0.055
-38%
0.043
-8%
0.063
-58%
4K-64 Write
1228.16
1695.31
38%
1197.05
-3%
1284.54
5%
1212.35
-1%
4K-64 Read
1411.79
1239.5
-12%
1366.28
-3%
1231.67
-13%
727.26
-48%
4K Write
125.82
107.11
-15%
94.41
-25%
107.92
-14%
96.04
-24%
4K Read
52.16
45.16
-13%
40.89
-22%
35.57
-32%
35.05
-33%
Seq Write
2860.45
1743.97
-39%
2667.63
-7%
1869.29
-35%
1328.15
-54%
Seq Read
2297.04
1831.1
-20%
3004.86
31%
2480.96
8%
1152.78
-50%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3296 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 654.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 571.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3118 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2935 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 133 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
5538 Points ∼60% +28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
5148 Points ∼56% +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H
4323 Points ∼47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (3958 - 4474, n=11)
4246 Points ∼46% -2%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
3896 Points ∼42% -10%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 8750H
3020 Points ∼33% -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
11099 Points ∼76% +39%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
9754 Points ∼66% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
8844 Points ∼60% +11%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H
8000 Points ∼54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=13)
7612 Points ∼52% -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
7105 Points ∼48% -11%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
6977 Points ∼48% -13%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 8750H
5783 Points ∼39% -28%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
5689 Points ∼39% -29%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
4867 Points ∼33% -39%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2805 Points ∼19% -65%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
27228 Points ∼67% +29%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
24623 Points ∼61% +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
23032 Points ∼57% +9%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21846 Points ∼54% +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H
21138 Points ∼52%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
21104 Points ∼52% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=14)
19951 Points ∼49% -6%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
18443 Points ∼45% -13%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
17792 Points ∼44% -16%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 8750H
15731 Points ∼39% -26%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
13355 Points ∼33% -37%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9537 Points ∼23% -55%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U
5622 Points ∼14% -73%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
16523 Points ∼73% +32%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
14228 Points ∼63% +14%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
13883 Points ∼61% +11%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
12643 Points ∼56% +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H
12512 Points ∼55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=16)
12262 Points ∼54% -2%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
12215 Points ∼54% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12170 Points ∼54% -3%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
11573 Points ∼51% -8%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11288 Points ∼50% -10%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10349 Points ∼46% -17%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9459 Points ∼42% -24%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 8750H
9099 Points ∼40% -27%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U
6774 Points ∼30% -46%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
6644 Points ∼29% -47%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
39651 Points ∼78% +48%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
34050 Points ∼67% +27%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
30910 Points ∼61% +16%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
28621 Points ∼56% +7%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
27275 Points ∼53% +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H
26752 Points ∼52%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
26438 Points ∼52% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 26975, n=16)
25509 Points ∼50% -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
23819 Points ∼47% -11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
23414 Points ∼46% -12%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
21286 Points ∼42% -20%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 8750H
20157 Points ∼40% -25%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
17170 Points ∼34% -36%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12193 Points ∼24% -54%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U
7016 Points ∼14% -74%
3DMark 11 Performance
21509 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
40478 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18195 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7863 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (min: 81, max: 119) fps ∼100% +40%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
100 fps ∼97% +36%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps ∼85% +18%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
73.8 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 80.6, n=14)
72.4 fps ∼70% -2%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
72 fps ∼70% -2%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.7 fps ∼63% -12%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55.1 fps ∼53% -25%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼47% -34%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
48.2 fps ∼47% -35%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34.2 fps ∼33% -54%
Asus G752VY-GC110T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
33.2 fps ∼32% -55%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
30 fps ∼29% -59%
01020304050607080Tooltip
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0): Ø72 (65-79)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 355 305.3 272.2 172.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 317.7 245.5 145.1 73.8 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 218.2 201.7 148.5 122 fps
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Noise
2%
-2%
-5%
-1%
-12%
off / environment *
28
28.2
-1%
29
-4%
30
-7%
28
-0%
29
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28
28.2
-1%
29
-4%
31
-11%
28.2
-1%
30
-7%
Idle Average *
28.4
28.2
1%
32
-13%
32
-13%
31.8
-12%
37
-30%
Idle Maximum *
32.9
30.8
6%
33
-0%
41
-25%
36.3
-10%
39
-19%
Load Average *
45
42
7%
47
-4%
47
-4%
46.7
-4%
54
-20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.2
51
4%
49
8%
47
12%
46.9
12%
54
-2%
Load Maximum *
53.2
53
-0%
51
4%
48
10%
49.7
7%
54
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 28.4 / 32.9 dB
Carga
45 / 53.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
 46 °C46.8 °C48.6 °C 
 37.4 °C41.8 °C45 °C 
 31.2 °C29 °C30.8 °C 
Máximo: 48.6 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
43.4 °C46.8 °C42.2 °C
40.4 °C46 °C35.6 °C
29.8 °C35.4 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.249.22543.150.1314552.84042.851.65041.353.76338.255.68038.357.310037.458.112535.660.11603563.220035.665.525034.367.1315337140031.973.250032.275.463031.278.880030.682.3100029.981.1125029.680.3160029.177200028.777250028.672.1315028.469.3400028.171.1500027.970.9630027.772.8800027.472.41000027.572.71250027.373.21600027.370.1SPL41.588.6N4.480.3median 29.6median 72.4Delta2.93.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Nightsky RX17Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.58 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18.6 / 22.6 / 23 Watt
Carga midlight 93.4 / 233.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Dell G7 17 7790
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Power Consumption
3%
-12%
18%
25%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
18.6
16.2
13%
26.3
-41%
9.5
49%
8.8
53%
37.5
-102%
Idle Average *
22.6
20.4
10%
29
-28%
16.2
28%
16.2
28%
37.6
-66%
Idle Maximum *
23
26.1
-13%
32.3
-40%
23.8
-3%
18.3
20%
37.6
-63%
Load Average *
93.4
96.5
-3%
82.4
12%
101.7
-9%
86.1
8%
122.4
-31%
Load Maximum *
233.6
214.3
8%
170.2
27%
172.2
26%
186.4
20%
277.4
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
186.4
182.9
2%
192
-3%
155
17%
146.7
21%
180.3
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 11min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 9min
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
59%
29%
75%
28%
58%
Reader / Idle
251
295
18%
298
19%
464
85%
WiFi v1.3
120
280
133%
230
92%
316
163%
153
28%
190
58%
Load
69
86
25%
52
-25%
54
-22%

Pro

+ Desempenho da CPU e GPU acima da média
+ Geralmente silencioso durante cargas leves
+ Leitor de digitais integrado no trackpad
+ Qualidade de áudio decente
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Bateria removível

Contra

- PWM em todos os níveis de brilho até 99 por cento
- Tempo de recarga lento quando sob cargas de processamento extremas
- Propriedades de deslizamento inconsistentes no trackpad de vidro
- Posição inconveniente do leitor SD
- Manutenção ou atualização inconvenientes
- Barulhento durante os jogos
- Sem RJ-45 de 2,5 Gbit
- Duração de bateria pobre
In review: Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Test model provided by Eurocom

Sempre citamos a facilidade de manutenção como a principal razão para possuir um portátil baseado em Clevo sobre opções mais populares da Asus, Alienware, Acer ou MSI. Infelizmente, este não é o caso do Eurocom Nightsky RX17. O fato de haver de duas a três vezes mais parafusos para serem removidos e de que o teclado precisa ser desconectado apenas para atualizar algo tão simples quanto RAM ou armazenamento é um passo na direção oposta. Os projetos da Clevo sempre foram bem-sucedidos em conectar o usuário aos componentes principais de um portátil mais do que os concorrentes, mas não sentimos o mesmo vínculo com a natureza fechada do Nightsky RX17. Quando se torna mais rápido e fácil adicionar uma barra de RAM a um Razer Blade Pro 17 do que a um barebone maior Clevo, então você sabe que fez algo errado em algum ponto.

Além da decepcionante capacidade de manutenção, o Nightsky RX17 não faz o suficiente para se destacar no mar de alternativas de jogos de 17 polegadas. Sim, o desempenho é excelente, mas o ruído do ventilador, a duração da bateria, a superfície do clickpad e a rigidez do chassi podem ser melhorados. O Asus ROG Strix Hero III G731GW pode ser encontrado on-line com a mesma CPU Core i7-9750H, GPU RTX 2070 e tela de 144 Hz como nossa configuração Eurocom por cerca de US $200 a US $300 a menos. Se você está insistindo em ter o melhor que o Clevo tem para oferecer, então o Eurocom Sky X4C ou X7C será uma melhor compra que o Nightsky RX17.

O Nightsky RX17 funciona um pouco mais rápido do que um portátil concorrente com o mesmo Core i7-9750H e GeForce RTX 2070. Infelizmente, é provável que também seja significativamente mais difícil fazer a manutenção ou atualizar.

Eurocom Nightsky RX17 - 07/01/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
73 / 81 → 90%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
63%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
70%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB70RC/PB71RC)
Allen Ngo, 2019-07- 3 (Update: 2019-07- 6)