C 2018
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 13Z980-A (i5-8250U)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/16/2018

Abaixo de um quilograma. O LG Gram 13 faz jus ao seu nome por ser um dos Ultrabooks mais leves de 13,3 polegadas atualmente disponíveis. No entanto, não é sem alguns sacrifícios, como seu conjunto barebone de recursos de hardware e tampa frágil se destacam como principais desvantagens.

LG Gram 13Z980-A (Gram Serie)
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 23.20.16.4849
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400 (1200 MHz), SK Hynix, 17-17-17-39
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitive, LG LP133WF6-SPC1, IPS, ID: LGD05AD, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Base PCH
Disco rígido
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm earphones, Card Reader: Leitor MicroSD , 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15 x 305 x 211
Bateria
72 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo 1.5 W x2, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador USB Type-C para RJ-45, Cartão de garantia, Guia de início, LG On-Screen Display 3, Control Center, Update Center, Reader mode, DTS Audio, , 12 Meses Garantia
peso
965 g, Suprimento de energia: 349 g
Preço
1200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-C Gen. 1
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-C Gen. 1
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm headphones, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm headphones, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s ∼100% +154%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
71 MB/s ∼39%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
67.37 MB/s ∼37% -5%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
204.9 MB/s ∼100% +139%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
88.07 MB/s ∼43% +3%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
85.64 MB/s ∼42%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
668 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
637 MBit/s ∼95%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
588 MBit/s ∼88% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
557 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
517 MBit/s ∼93% 0%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s ∼93%
340.3
cd/m²
342.2
cd/m²
328.3
cd/m²
346.9
cd/m²
347.8
cd/m²
327.7
cd/m²
316.2
cd/m²
322.3
cd/m²
310.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 347.8 cd/m² Médio: 331.4 cd/m² Minimum: 25.26 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 966:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.37 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
LG Gram 13Z980-A
LG LP133WF6-SPC1, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
SHP1484, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
AU Optronics AUO422D, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.9, 1920x1080
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3, 2160x1440
Response Times
-17%
-66%
21%
-18%
13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 (19.6, 18)
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
-11%
62.4 (32.4, 30)
-66%
27 (12, 15)
28%
46 (20.8, 25.2)
-22%
33 (15, 18)
12%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (16.8, 10.8)
34 (20, 14)
-23%
45.6 (24.4, 21.2)
-65%
24 (14, 10)
13%
31.6 (18.4, 13.2)
-14%
24 (12, 12)
13%
PWM Frequency
210.1 (99)
1008 (20)
Screen
-10%
-7%
-8%
-54%
11%
Brightness middle
347.8
510.7
47%
428
23%
304
-13%
297.9
-14%
408
17%
Brightness
331
481
45%
405
22%
287
-13%
278
-16%
395
19%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
87
-2%
80
-10%
81
-9%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.66
-83%
0.26
28%
0.21
42%
0.44
-22%
0.45
-25%
Contrast
966
774
-20%
1646
70%
1448
50%
677
-30%
907
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.37
2.4
-1%
3.8
-60%
3.66
-54%
5.1
-115%
1.55
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.21
7.3
-73%
7.2
-71%
5.66
-34%
11
-161%
2.19
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.21
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.4
4%
4.4
-76%
3.51
-40%
6.7
-168%
1.91
24%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.55 86%
2.9 76%
2.34 94%
CCT
6384 102%
6747 96%
7067 92%
6955 93%
6839 95%
6491 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.5
57
-9%
62.8
0%
59
-6%
64.1
3%
61
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
88.1
-9%
96.4
-1%
91
-6%
91.7
-5%
96
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -11%
-37% / -17%
7% / -4%
-36% / -48%
12% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
161 Points ∼78% +13%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼75% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼71% +2%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
145 Points ∼70% +1%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼69%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
142 Points ∼69% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼63% -8%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
127 Points ∼61% -11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
123 Points ∼59% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U
118 Points ∼57% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼24% +40%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 Points ∼20% +18%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
523 Points ∼17%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
515 Points ∼17% -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼17% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
367 Points ∼12% -30%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
353 Points ∼11% -33%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼11% -37%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points ∼10% -40%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points ∼9% -44%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼78% +13%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.62 Points ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.61 Points ∼69% -1%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.61 Points ∼69% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼65% -6%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.48 Points ∼63% -9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼62% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.21 Points ∼52% -25%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.16 Points ∼50% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼30% +68%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.91 Points ∼26% +42%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼22% +22%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
4.86 Points ∼18%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.96 Points ∼15% -19%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼14% -24%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.56 Points ∼13% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.4 Points ∼13% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.23 Points ∼12% -34%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points ∼55% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
5595 Points ∼52% +2%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
5497 Points ∼51%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5433 Points ∼50% -1%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
5145 Points ∼47% -6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
4975 Points ∼46% -9%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
4779 Points ∼44% -13%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4473 Points ∼41% -19%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points ∼44% +27%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17971 Points ∼36% +4%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
17267 Points ∼35%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16466 Points ∼33% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
12799 Points ∼26% -26%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
11373 Points ∼23% -34%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
11324 Points ∼23% -34%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
9158 Points ∼18% -47%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
521.22 s * ∼6% -59%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
489.402 s * ∼6% -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
473.575 s * ∼6% -44%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
436.057 s * ∼5% -33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
375.873 s * ∼4% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
331.085 s * ∼4% -1%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
328.065 s * ∼4%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.67 s * ∼3% +29%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
696.928 Seconds * ∼3% -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
654.006 Seconds * ∼3% -7%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
645.84 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
627.687 Seconds * ∼3% -3%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel Core i5-8250U
608.61 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
594.092 Seconds * ∼3% +2%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
590.45 Seconds * ∼3% +3%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
571.795 Seconds * ∼3% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8850
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
17267
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5497
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
4.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
44.49 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
523 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
50.81 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5154 Points ∼79% +12%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4906 Points ∼75% +7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4786 Points ∼73% +4%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4592 Points ∼70%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4562 Points ∼70% -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5342 Points ∼56% +61%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5044 Points ∼53% +52%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5011 Points ∼53% +51%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4577 Points ∼48% +38%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3308 Points ∼35%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3999 Points ∼66% +23%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3994 Points ∼66% +23%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3728 Points ∼61% +15%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3705 Points ∼61% +14%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3241 Points ∼53%
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4012 Points ∼52% +19%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3764 Points ∼48% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3449 Points ∼44% +2%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3381 Points ∼44%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3241 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3308 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4592 pontos
Ajuda
LG Gram 13Z980-A
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
AS SSD
28%
8%
180%
72%
Copy Game MB/s
191.66
186.76
-3%
381.23
99%
319.2
67%
225.92
18%
Copy Program MB/s
127.55
213.04
67%
337.82
165%
463.32
263%
156.35
23%
Copy ISO MB/s
204.5
335.88
64%
694.82
240%
1340.54
556%
297.84
46%
Score Total
997
1057
6%
1879
88%
2536
154%
2266
127%
Score Write
316
350
11%
105
-67%
608
92%
360
14%
Score Read
453
463
2%
1201
165%
1316
191%
1293
185%
Access Time Write *
0.235
0.053
77%
2.294
-876%
0.028
88%
0.034
86%
Access Time Read *
0.084
0.066
21%
0.073
13%
0.044
48%
0.069
18%
4K-64 Write
231.25
223.84
-3%
69.68
-70%
391.27
69%
223.74
-3%
4K-64 Read
376.66
379.44
1%
1020.29
171%
1039.22
176%
1121.81
198%
4K Write
60.97
79.23
30%
1.07
-98%
128.14
110%
107.74
77%
4K Read
27.16
31.24
15%
45.86
69%
48.46
78%
38.11
40%
Seq Write
241.7
466.02
93%
337.45
40%
885.3
266%
282.61
17%
Seq Read
496.37
519.84
5%
1350.57
172%
2281.75
360%
1331.91
168%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 554.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 254.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 214.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 197.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 480.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 255.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 25.67 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.92 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
4226 Points ∼24% +165%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2975 Points ∼17% +86%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2683 Points ∼15% +68%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057, max: 2200) Points ∼12% +37%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1597 Points ∼9%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
1279 Points ∼7% -20%
Huawei Matebook E
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1181 Points ∼7% -26%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
1112 Points ∼6% -30%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
4631 Points ∼9% +161%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% +100%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2849 Points ∼6% +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355, max: 2425) Points ∼5% +34%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1773 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
1606 Points ∼3% -9%
Huawei Matebook E
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1256 Points ∼2% -29%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
1220 Points ∼2% -31%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
3628 Points ∼9% +221%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2340 Points ∼6% +107%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2310 Points ∼6% +105%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484, max: 1547) Points ∼4% +36%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1129 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
959 Points ∼2% -15%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
755 Points ∼2% -33%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
21153 Points ∼11% +132%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
15186 Points ∼8% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
13362 Points ∼7% +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969, max: 11750) Points ∼6% +26%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9132 Points ∼5%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
8104 Points ∼4% -11%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
6286 Points ∼3% -31%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Envy 17-ae143ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
80859 Points ∼11% +59%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
68150 Points ∼9% +34%
LG Gram 13Z980-A
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
50888 Points ∼7%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
45638 Points ∼6% -10%
3DMark 11 Performance
1965 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
59410 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7325 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1014 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 633529.29.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.513.5fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB
Carga
34.3 / 34.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
LG Gram 13Z980-A
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Noise
-1%
-3%
-3%
-2%
-13%
off / environment *
28.1
28.4
-1%
29.1
-4%
30.13
-7%
28
-0%
31.15
-11%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
28.4
-1%
29.1
-4%
30.13
-7%
28
-0%
31.15
-11%
Idle Average *
28.1
28.4
-1%
29.1
-4%
30.13
-7%
28.8
-2%
31.15
-11%
Idle Maximum *
28.1
28.4
-1%
29.1
-4%
30.13
-7%
30.3
-8%
31.15
-11%
Load Average *
34.3
33.2
3%
32.2
6%
31.5
8%
34.5
-1%
38.2
-11%
Load Maximum *
34.3
35.2
-3%
37.3
-9%
33.5
2%
34.3
-0%
41.7
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 30.2 °C40.2 °C29 °C 
 29.8 °C37 °C25.8 °C 
 24 °C24.6 °C23 °C 
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C
41.4 °C42.4 °C33.4 °C
31.6 °C32.2 °C32.6 °C
28.6 °C30 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  37 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.534.336.52533.433.733.43133.832.233.8403432.834503331.3336331.731.131.78030.531.430.51003029.33012528.929.328.916037.227.637.220043.626.143.62505025.85031554265440058.225.258.250061.724.861.763064.224.164.280066.823.866.8100069.723.969.7125066.623.666.6160065.323.365.3200061.62361.6250058.72358.7315056.922.856.9400055.722.955.7500060.322.860.3630069.522.869.5800068.622.868.61000062.722.962.71250060.12360.11600064.22364.2SPL76.935.576.9N38.82.538.8median 60.3median 23.6median 60.3Delta7.21.17.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Gram 13Z980-AApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Gram 13Z980-A audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.19 / 0.47 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.3 / 7.4 Watt
Carga midlight 36.1 / 35.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG Gram 13Z980-A
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
5350U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SM0128G, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3
Power Consumption
-21%
4%
5%
8%
5%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.8
3%
3.14
19%
2.8
28%
3.1
21%
3.4
13%
Idle Average *
7.3
11
-51%
5.22
28%
6.2
15%
6.6
10%
6.3
14%
Idle Maximum *
7.4
11.3
-53%
6
19%
9.4
-27%
7
5%
7
5%
Load Average *
36.1
35.6
1%
38.5
-7%
32.2
11%
35.2
2%
34.5
4%
Load Maximum *
35.8
37.2
-4%
50.4
-41%
36.6
-2%
34.6
3%
40
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 04min
LG Gram 13Z980-A
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
HP Spectre 13-af033ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
5350U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
-61%
-11%
-51%
-5%
-12%
Reader / Idle
695
1417
1655
WiFi v1.3
724
279
-61%
644
-11%
352
-51%
685
-5%
638
-12%
Load
60
119
104
140

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria; grande capacidade da bateria
+ Cores precisas, de fábrica
+ Localização normal da webcam
+ Certificação MIL-STD 810G
+ 2 slots M.2 2280 NVMe
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Muito leve
+ Leitor de MicroSD
+ Ruído baixo da ventoinha
+ Trackpad grande
+ Tela viva

Contra

- Dependente de adaptador de CA proprietário; não pode carregar o sistema através do USB Type-C
- Sem reforço de Gorilla Glass; tampa frágil e flexível
- Limitado a apenas 1080p e 8 GB de RAM
- A iluminação da tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- A capacidade de manutenção poderia ser mais simples
- Tela é propensa a arranhões
- Sem opções de GPU discretas
- Carregamento relativamente lento
- Botões do trackpad esponjosos
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
In review: LG Gram 13Z980-A
In review: LG Gram 13Z980-A

O Gram 13 exibe conjuntos únicos de vantagens e desvantagens em comparação com outros portáteis. No lado positivo, sua tela é mais precisa do que muitos outros Ultrabooks e a duração da bateria é surpreendentemente longa. Este último aspecto é particularmente notável, já que alternativas mais pesadas, como o XPS 13 ou o Spectre 13, possuem tempos de duração comparativamente mais curtos. Em contraste com o Samsung NP900X3N, o LG é a prova de que a duração da bateria não tem que sofrer quando se pretende um design super leve.

Os principais pontos negativos do sistema são difíceis de ignorar quando colocados ao lado da lista de pontos positivos. A tampa é muito frágil e flexível, especialmente para uma tela táctil, e as variações muito limitadas nos SKUs fazem com que o Gram 13 se sinta menos capaz do que os Ultrabooks mais populares. O XPS 13Samsung NP900X3N, e Spectre 13, por exemplo, contam com Intel iris ou 4K, gráficos GeForce MX150, e opções Thunderbolt 3, respectivamente, algo que não encontramos no Gram 13. É uma experiência mais barebone com o LG, já que os usuários estão sacrificando o desempenho e os recursos em nome da portabilidade e do peso.

Outros atributos importantes, como a rigidez do chassi, a resposta do teclado e do trackpad e o brilho da tela, são apenas médios, se não um pouco abaixo dos concorrentes populares. Embora o Gram 13 seja muito leve, não é o melhor companheiro ao ar livre, já que há Ultrabooks mais brilhantes e inflexíveis por aí, nessa faixa de preços.

Se a visibilidade ao ar livre é primordial, o Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N é a opção mais brilhante ao pesar menos que o LG. Seu peso leve, longa duração da bateria e slots M.2 duplos são os principais atributos que o Gram 13 tem sobre a maior parte de sua concorrência. Caso contrário, o sistema estéril não oferece nada atraente ou indispensável para o alto preço inicial de $1.200.

LG Gram 13Z980-A - 04/13/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
71 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
76%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
48 / 81 → 59%
Peso
76 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 85 → 69%
Desempenho da aplicação
84 / 92 → 92%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
97 / 95 → 100%
Audio
64%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
75%
82%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 13Z980-A (i5-8250U)
Allen Ngo, 2018-04-16 (Update: 2018-04-23)