Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível LG Gram 14T90N: Um downgrade da CPU
LG Gram 14T90N (Gram Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 26.20.100.7323
Memória
16 GB
, 8 GB soldados, 8 GB DDR4-2666 SODIMM, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Capacitiva 10-pontos, native pen support, LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, LGD0644, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB
peso
1.15 kg, Suprimento de energia: 254 g
Preço
1400 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.2 % | 04/2020 | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.2 % | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.5 % | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.9 % | 11/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
7.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 322.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 301.5 cd/m² Minimum: 21.36 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 322.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1289:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.22
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.40, 1920x1200 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.90, 3000x2000 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 19% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 64.7 0% | 66.7 3% | 69.9 8% | 65.9 1% | 83 28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.7 | 94.3 -1% | 92.3 -4% | 99.2 4% | 95.2 -1% | 99.7 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.7 | 66 -1% | 67.5 1% | 71.5 7% | 67.6 1% | 83.1 25% |
| Response Times | 21% | 27% | 12% | 24% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 54 ? | 36.8 ? 32% | 36 ? 33% | 47.6 ? 12% | 40.4 ? 25% | 49.2 ? 9% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 30 ? 9% | 26 ? 21% | 29.2 ? 11% | 25.6 ? 22% | 32.2 ? 2% |
| PWM Frequency | 44 ? | 2500 ? | 201.6 ? | |||
| Screen | -17% | -49% | 20% | -4% | -32% | |
| Brightness middle | 322.2 | 333.8 4% | 253 -21% | 549.8 71% | 442.7 37% | 532 65% |
| Brightness | 301 | 307 2% | 245 -19% | 520 73% | 428 42% | 513 70% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 83 -3% | 78 -9% | 86 0% | 84 -2% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.4 -60% | 0.225 10% | 0.39 -56% | 0.31 -24% | 0.41 -64% |
| Contrast | 1289 | 835 -35% | 1124 -13% | 1410 9% | 1428 11% | 1298 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.62 | 3.54 2% | 8.89 -146% | 2.12 41% | 2.24 38% | 6.88 -90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.9 | 5.8 16% | 4.56 34% | 3.66 47% | 7.19 -4% | 12.65 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.22 | 2.36 -93% | 4.9 -302% | 1.37 -12% | 1.11 9% | 2.52 -107% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 4.7 -21% | 6.33 -62% | 2.6 33% | 9.7 -149% | 10.5 -169% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.14 103% | 2.52 87% | 2.3 96% | 1.42 155% | 1.98 111% |
| CCT | 6344 102% | 6261 104% | 6745 96% | 6884 94% | 6227 104% | 7394 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.3 | 61.2 0% | 60 -2% | 65.4 7% | 61.6 0% | 74.1 21% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.6 | 94.7 -1% | 91 -5% | 99.7 4% | 95 -1% | 99.7 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-9% | -7% /
-30% | 13% /
16% | 7% /
0% | -2% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø462 (454.02-529.49)
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø437 (404.11-539.89)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB RKT30Q.1; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø650 (621.2-684.29)
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø550 (517.87-676.69)
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3646 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5153 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4167 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -63% | -32% | -76% | -21% | |
| Seq Read | 1829 | 476.1 -74% | 1417 -23% | 1801 -2% | 1786 -2% |
| Seq Write | 2048 | 487.4 -76% | 781 -62% | 1125 -45% | 1259 -39% |
| 4K Read | 54.2 | 30.57 -44% | 37.03 -32% | 39.7 -27% | 45.86 -15% |
| 4K Write | 120.5 | 66.1 -45% | 80.1 -34% | 67 -44% | 147.9 23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1512 | 352.9 -77% | 740 -51% | 1253 -17% | 885 -41% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1573 | 263.1 -83% | 748 -52% | 209 -87% | 950 -40% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.092 -100% | 0.047 -2% | 0.069 -50% | 0.058 -26% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.091 | 0.055 40% | 0.045 51% | 0.625 -587% | 0.074 19% |
| Score Read | 1749 | 431 -75% | 918 -48% | 1472 -16% | 1110 -37% |
| Score Write | 1899 | 378 -80% | 906 -52% | 388 -80% | 1224 -36% |
| Score Total | 4560 | 1040 -77% | 2270 -50% | 2583 -43% | 2885 -37% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1891 | 514 -73% | 1293 -32% | 1384 -27% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 569 | 259.3 -54% | 560 -2% | 525 -8% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1425 | 521 -63% | 927 -35% | 1008 -29% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -69% | -45% | -23% | -3% | |
| Write 4K | 181.4 | 74.7 -59% | 118.8 -35% | 106.7 -41% | 151.5 -16% |
| Read 4K | 52.5 | 14.89 -72% | 41.62 -21% | 49.94 -5% | 45.83 -13% |
| Write Seq | 1592 | 502 -68% | 796 -50% | 1223 -23% | 2060 29% |
| Read Seq | 1617 | 498.6 -69% | 1101 -32% | 1801 11% | 1973 22% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 556 | 214.3 -61% | 234.7 -58% | 325.3 -41% | 489.8 -12% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 539 | 225.5 -58% | 313.8 -42% | 551 2% | 386.2 -28% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2955 | 505 -83% | 842 -72% | 1224 -59% | 2703 -9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3270 | 560 -83% | 1645 -50% | 2350 -28% | 3376 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -66% /
-65% | -39% /
-38% | -50% /
-57% | -12% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3270 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2955 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
539 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
556 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1617 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1592 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
52.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
181.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1923 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 14669 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6582 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1056 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 429 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.8 | 38.4 | 32 | 10.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 57.6 | 39.1 | 19 | 17 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 20.5 | 13.2 | 12 |
| LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 28.2 3% | 29.8 -3% | 28.1 3% | 27.9 4% | 28.5 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 28.4 5% | 28 7% | 28.1 6% | 27.9 7% | 28.5 5% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 28.4 5% | 28 7% | 28.1 6% | 27.9 7% | 28.5 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 28.4 5% | 28 7% | 28.1 6% | 27.9 7% | 29 3% |
| Load Average * | 35.2 | 35.7 -1% | 36.8 -5% | 31.7 10% | 36.2 -3% | 33 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 37 | 34.2 8% | 39 -5% | 43.4 -17% | 45.2 -22% | 39.5 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 | 45 | 40.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.2 / 37 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.31 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.9 / 5.8 / 6.2 Watt |
| Carga |
32.9 / 48.5 Watt |
   
| |
| LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | -26% | -5% | -49% | -73% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 2.7 7% | 3.6 -24% | 2.6 10% | 3.5 -21% | 5.6 -93% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 6 -3% | 7.2 -24% | 5.3 9% | 8.9 -53% | 10.5 -81% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 6.5 -5% | 10.8 -74% | 7 -13% | 12.3 -98% | 12 -94% |
| Load Average * | 32.9 | 32.5 1% | 38 -16% | 43.1 -31% | 54.2 -65% | 53.3 -62% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.5 | 35.5 27% | 45.2 7% | 49 -1% | 52.1 -7% | 64.6 -33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.1 | 42.4 | 46.9 |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | -37% | -28% | -25% | -20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1966 | 2238 14% | 1068 -46% | 1243 -37% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 751 | 720 -4% | 404 -46% | 537 -28% | 557 -26% | 598 -20% |
| Load | 153 | 159 4% | 125 -18% | 133 -13% |
Pro
+ Duas baias de armazenamento M.2 2280; RAM expansível
+ Escencialmente silencioso durante cargas medianas
+ Suporte para carregamento USB Tipo C
+ Muito leve para o tamanho
+ Stylus ativo incluído
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Leitor de MicroSD
+ Ruído baixo da ventoinha
+ Thunderbolt 3
Contra
- Sem opções de GPU RX Vega, Iris ou GeForce
- A visibilidade em exteriores poderia ser melhor
- Teclas Enter e Direcionais pequenas
- Desempenho de CPU decepcionante
- Os alto-falantes poderiam ser mais potentes
- Botões do clickpad esponjosos
- Acessibilidade difícil
- Sem obturador na webcam
- Sem câmera IV
- Caro
A diferença entre o LG Gram14T990 mais antigo e o LG Gram 14T90N mais recente é marginal, na melhor das hipóteses. A atualização do processador é quase imperceptível, o que deixa o Thunderbolt 3 como o principal fator de distinção entre os dois modelos. Se você planeja utilizar dispositivos baseados no Thunderbolt 3, como estações docking e monitores externos, encontrará valor no Gram 14T90N. Caso contrário, economize algumas centenas de dólares e opte pelo Gram14T990.
Existem algumas vantagens notáveis que o conversível da LG tem sobre os concorrentes. O baixo peso torna mais fácil o uso no modo tablet do que o ZenBook 14 Flip e as duas baias de armazenamento interno são uma raridade, considerando a categoria. Mesmo assim, o sistema se sente com pouca energia para o preço, especialmente em termos de potencial gráfico, enquanto recursos de privacidade comuns, como um obturador de webcam ou câmera IR, não estão presentes. Talvez uma CPU Core i7 Ice Lake funcionasse melhor considerando o público-alvo. A tela também poderia ter sido mais brilhante para maior visibilidade ao ar livre.
O Gram 14T90N é um conversível de US$ 1400 com uma CPU de baixo desempenho e nada mais. Você precisará usar seu peso leve, bateria de longa duração e a porta Thunderbolt 3 para aproveitar ao máximo o sistema.
LG Gram 14T90N
-
04/06/2020 v7
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
