Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact

Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/30/2016

Compacto e duradouro, mas não mais gama alta. A Sony mais uma vez oferece uma versão Compact do seu smartphone carro chefe este ano. No entanto, o modelo menor terá que se virar com componentes mais lentos desde agora. Nossa análise mostra por que isto não é necessariamente um problema.

Sony Xperia X Compact (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 1.8 GHz
Placa gráfica
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
4.6 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 319 PPI, capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, IPS, Tela TRILUMINOS para Mobile, X-Reality, Dynamic Contrast, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Impressão digital, acelerômetro, giroscópio, proximidade, barômetro, bússola, espaço de cor, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, App2SD, SAR Head: 1.08 W/kg, SAR Body: 1.25 W/kg
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), HSUPA até 5.76 Mbps, HSDPA até 42.2 Mbps, LTE Cat 6 até 300 Mbps downstream, 50 Mbps upstream, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 129 x 65
Bateria
2700 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 44 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 47 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 750 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 710 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix (autofoco preditivo, sensor Exmor-R 1/2,3", 22 mm wide angle, Vídeo: 1080p60)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R sensor 1/5", 25 mm wide angle)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo na frente, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 7.5-Watt PSU, cabo USB, fones, guia de início rápido, informação do serviço, Xperia-Apps, Google-Apps, AVG Protection, SwiftKey, PlayStation, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless
peso
135 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
449 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Top: 3.5 mm headphones
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Bottom: USB 2.0 Type-C
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia X Compact
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
327 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
320 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼100% +51%
Sony Xperia X Compact
802.11a/ac/b/g/n (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
214 MBit/s ∼66%
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Overview
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Crossing
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Sony Xperia X Compact: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 1486 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

516
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 587 cd/m² Médio: 563.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.04 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 579 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.24
Sony Xperia X Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Apple iPhone SE
IPS, 1136x640, 4
Apple iPhone 6S
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Sony Xperia X
LCD, 1920x1080, 5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-4%
-18%
-5%
14%
-35%
15%
Brightness
563
443
-21%
532
-6%
579
3%
549
-2%
392
-30%
431
-23%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
94
7%
93
6%
87
-1%
91
3%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.54
-35%
0.88
-120%
0.39
2%
0.68
-70%
Contrast
1448
1128
-22%
1013
-30%
685
-53%
1415
-2%
594
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.4
11%
7.37
-21%
1.8
70%
3.4
44%
7.1
-16%
4.1
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
6.7
4%
8.39
-20%
2.3
67%
4.16
41%
9.7
-39%
3.3
53%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.33 103%
2.28 105%
2.21 109%
2.21 109%
2.23 108%
2.1 114%
CCT
8395 77%
8262 79%
9074 72%
6955 93%
7288 89%
9502 68%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9865
96.74
95.93
100
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.13
62.18
89.38

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (44.1 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% +86%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
126969 Points ∼69% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
94671 Points ∼51% +24%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
77650 Points ∼42% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
76216 Points ∼41%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
5645 Points ∼17% +45%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4422 Points ∼14% +14%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4386 Points ∼14% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3885 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3853 Points ∼12% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2539 Points ∼53% +67%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2533 Points ∼53% +67%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2398 Points ∼50% +58%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1518 Points ∼32%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1484 Points ∼31% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
5481 Points ∼20% +64%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4097 Points ∼15% +23%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3343 Points ∼12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1754 Points ∼32% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1726 Points ∼31% +24%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1388 Points ∼25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼68% +21%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1935 Points ∼65% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1675 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3249 Points ∼80% +275%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
867 Points ∼21%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
816 Points ∼20% -6%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2823 Points ∼75% +191%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
971 Points ∼26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
941 Points ∼25% -3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1912 Points ∼78% +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1697 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1486 Points ∼61% -12%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1211 Points ∼49% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4804 Points ∼82% +250%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1373 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1354 Points ∼23% -1%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1066 Points ∼18% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3595 Points ∼75% +151%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1434 Points ∼30%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1381 Points ∼29% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1095 Points ∼23% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2482 Points ∼97% +53%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1892 Points ∼74% +17%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Metal)
1749 Points ∼69% +8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1624 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1504 Points ∼59% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1472 Points ∼58% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2864 Points ∼53% +271%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Metal)
2524 Points ∼47% +227%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1137 Points ∼21% +47%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
818 Points ∼15% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
772 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
761 Points ∼14% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2571 Points ∼66% +194%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Metal)
2298 Points ∼59% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1198 Points ∼31% +37%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
961 Points ∼25% +10%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
874 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
855 Points ∼22% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2587 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1789 Points ∼69% +12%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1649 Points ∼64% +3%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1601 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1441 Points ∼56% -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1100 Points ∼43% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4633 Points ∼60% +252%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4255 Points ∼55% +223%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2353 Points ∼30% +79%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1318 Points ∼17%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1280 Points ∼17% -3%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1112 Points ∼14% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3424 Points ∼70% +150%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3149 Points ∼65% +130%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1878 Points ∼39% +37%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1372 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1313 Points ∼27% -4%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1273 Points ∼26% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
21771 Points ∼32% +55%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
15531 Points ∼22% +11%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
14023 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13717 Points ∼20% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
13097 Points ∼19% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
13065 Points ∼19% -7%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10801 Points ∼16% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
44059 Points ∼10% +106%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
42686 Points ∼9% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
37319 Points ∼8% +75%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
34023 Points ∼7% +59%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
22157 Points ∼5% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21349 Points ∼5%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
21087 Points ∼5% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30241 Points ∼15% +58%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
29538 Points ∼15% +54%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28419 Points ∼14% +49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
26420 Points ∼13% +38%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20235 Points ∼10% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
19128 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
17404 Points ∼9% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
89 fps ∼7% +187%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
80.3 fps ∼6% +159%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
79.6 fps ∼6% +157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
56 fps ∼4% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
41 fps ∼3% +32%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
31 fps ∼2%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼2% -3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
60 fps ∼13% +18%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.2 fps ∼13% +16%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
59.1 fps ∼13% +16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
57 fps ∼12% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
51 fps ∼11%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
43 fps ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
33 fps ∼7% -35%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
47 fps ∼9% +213%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
40 fps ∼7% +167%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
39.5 fps ∼7% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
25 fps ∼5% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼3% +27%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼3%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.2 fps ∼2% -39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
58.1 fps ∼26% +94%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
56 fps ∼25% +87%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
46 fps ∼20% +53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
45 fps ∼20% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼13%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼8% -37%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼7% -50%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
31 fps ∼7% +230%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
28.1 fps ∼7% +199%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
18 fps ∼4% +91%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10 fps ∼2% +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
9.4 fps ∼2%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4.6 fps ∼1% -51%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
57.9 fps ∼33% +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
38 fps ∼22% +73%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30 fps ∼17% +36%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
22 fps ∼13%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
11 fps ∼6% -50%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
10 fps ∼6% -55%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼5% +233%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.3 fps ∼2% +17%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.4 fps ∼2%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.3 fps ∼2% -2%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
18 fps ∼15% +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
12 fps ∼10%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6.9 fps ∼6% -42%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
5.9 fps ∼5% -51%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +49%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6735 Points ∼83% +41%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4770 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
4379 Points ∼54% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
4084 Points ∼50% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1226 Points ∼80% +20%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1207 Points ∼78% +18%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1112 Points ∼72% +9%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1019 Points ∼66%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
994 Points ∼64% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
976 Points ∼63% -4%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
774 Points ∼50% -24%
Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4813 Points ∼56% +194%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4323 Points ∼50% +164%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
4175 Points ∼49% +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
3094 Points ∼36% +89%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1703 Points ∼20% +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1638 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1581 Points ∼18% -3%
Memory
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2556 Points ∼66% +42%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2052 Points ∼53% +14%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1796 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1408 Points ∼37% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1281 Points ∼33% -29%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
1032 Points ∼27% -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
963 Points ∼25% -46%
System
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
5179 Points ∼79% +67%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
3952 Points ∼60% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3537 Points ∼54% +14%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
3466 Points ∼53% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
3107 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
2564 Points ∼39% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
2082 Points ∼32% -33%
Overall
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2496 Points ∼76% +43%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2287 Points ∼69% +31%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2194 Points ∼66% +26%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼62% +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1747 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
1569 Points ∼48% -10%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
1450 Points ∼44% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari)
16550 Points ∼100% +85%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari Mobile 9.01)
16200 Points ∼98% +81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
10692 Points ∼65% +19%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼55% +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 53)
8952 Points ∼54%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 51.0.02704.81)
8388 Points ∼51% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430 (Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76, Android 5.1.1)
5691 Points ∼34% -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430 (Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76, Android 5.1.1)
4210.4 ms * ∼100% -23%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 51.0.02704.81)
3677 ms * ∼87% -8%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 53)
3417 ms * ∼81%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
2979 ms * ∼71% +13%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼69% +15%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
1715 ms * ∼41% +50%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari)
1708.9 ms * ∼41% +50%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari Mobile 9.01)
187 Points ∼100% +72%
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari)
186 Points ∼99% +71%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
138 Points ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼65% +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 53)
109 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430 (Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76, Android 5.1.1)
104 Points ∼56% -5%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 51.0.02704.81)
92 Points ∼49% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari)
118.76 Points ∼100% +133%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600 (Safari Mobile 9.01)
118.6 Points ∼100% +133%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
64.046 Points ∼54% +26%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼46% +7%
Sony Xperia X Compact
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 53)
51 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia X
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510 (Chrome 51.0.02704.81)
50.92 Points ∼43% 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430 (Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76, Android 5.1.1)
49 Points ∼41% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia X Compact
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia X
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5
50%
-22%
-17%
135%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
27.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
12.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
32.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
65%
17.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-46%
Random Write 4KB
9.3
31.5
239%
7.81
-16%
10.26
10%
18.23
96%
Random Read 4KB
31.52
34.16
8%
14.15
-55%
36.28
15%
137.62
337%
Sequential Write 256KB
139.49
119.25
-15%
88.91
-36%
117.38
-16%
153.3
10%
Sequential Read 256KB
207.87
247.46
19%
248.15
19%
184.33
-11%
408.71
97%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 38.6 °C39.2 °C40.5 °C 
 37.8 °C39.8 °C41.2 °C 
 37.3 °C39 °C40.8 °C 
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
37.4 °C40.9 °C41.8 °C
39.5 °C41.5 °C41.8 °C
37.7 °C41.5 °C40.8 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.62525.434.93125.330.14032.940.65033.638.26331.635.48028.428.81002725.912520.825.41602225.620021.332.725020.84031521.246.340019.452.750019.560.863017.762.680017.970.2100017.871.5125017.370.2160017.467200016.770.1250017.269.9315018.269.7400017.969.3500017.669.9630017.768.7800017.868.51000017.964.11250018.164.11600018.260.9SPL3081N1.348median 17.9Sony Xperia X Compactmedian 64.1Delta1.311.731.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9Honor 8median 61.11.310.734.243.535.434.229.238.729.729.238.336.729.538.329.934.329.729.935.747.939.735.727.739.133.927.727.330.428.527.3312528.23129.623.32629.636.724.820.636.744.829.420.744.847.834.820.647.854.236.92154.254.43818.454.458.743.418.758.763.747.217.963.767.852.218.667.871.457.217.571.470.356.616.970.369.655.817.469.669.255.116.269.266.551.816.966.566.550.717.566.569.352.117.269.375.556.717.775.576.456.917.476.474.65517.674.667.948.817.667.957.741.717.857.754.741.417.954.783.266.329.883.25419.51.354median 66.5Apple iPhone SEmedian 48.8median 17.8median 66.59.3101.69.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia X Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple iPhone SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.33 / 1.48 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 4.83 / 8.66 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia X Compact
 Wh, 4.6, 1280x720
Honor 8
11.4 Wh, 5.2, 1920x1080
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 Wh, 4.6, 1280x720
Apple iPhone SE
6.21 Wh, 4, 1136x640
Apple iPhone 6S
7 Wh, 4.7, 1334x750
Sony Xperia X
 Wh, 5, 1920x1080
OnePlus 3
 Wh, 5.5, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-32%
-18%
7%
3%
-20%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.33
0.78
-136%
0.6
-82%
0.54
-64%
0.5
-52%
0.56
-70%
0.57
-73%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.89
-28%
1.4
5%
1.26
15%
1.6
-8%
1.69
-14%
1.24
16%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.02
-26%
1.7
-6%
1.4
12%
1.9
-19%
1.75
-9%
1.36
15%
Load Average *
4.83
5.28
-9%
5.3
-10%
2.45
49%
2.5
48%
6.01
-24%
5.92
-23%
Load Maximum *
8.66
5.44
37%
8.4
3%
6.46
25%
4.8
45%
7.03
19%
10.53
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
47h 24min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 06min
Sony Xperia X Compact
2700 mAh,  Wh
Honor 8
3000 mAh, 11.4 Wh
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
 mAh,  Wh
Apple iPhone SE
1624 mAh, 6.21 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S
 mAh, 7 Wh
Sony Xperia X
2620 mAh,  Wh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh,  Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-9%
-3%
-20%
-22%
17%
Reader / Idle
2844
1487
-48%
2249
-21%
1274
-55%
1510
-47%
1240
-56%
1338
-53%
Load
186
255
37%
242
30%
207
11%
137
-26%
213
15%
268
44%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
601
499
-17%
440
-27%
673
12%
492
-18%
434
-28%
840
40%
H.264
624
526
-16%
525
-16%
759
22%
699
12%
518
-17%
847
36%

Pro

+ Qualidade de construção muito boa
+ Bom desempenho
+ Longa duração da bateria na prática
+ USB Tipo C
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Boa câmera
+ Tela brilhante
+ Expansão do armazenamento via microSD

Contra

- Superfícies refletivas sensíveis
- Chassi comparativamente grosso
- Apenas USB 2.0
- Mais lento que modelos anteriores em alguns cenários
- Não há mais certificação IP (água, poeira)
- Sem gravação de vídeos em 4K
In review: Sony Xperia X Compact. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Sony Xperia X Compact. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Após a análise do novo Xperia X Compact, ficamos um pouco decepcionados que não existem mais telefones Android compactos e de gama alta. Se você deseja ter os componentes mais velozes, agora terá que adquirir um aparelho maior ou dar uma olhada na concorrência da Apple.

No entanto, uma vez que aceite isso, você verá que o novo Sony é um smartphone mainstream muito sólido, e o preço também foi reduzido em comparação com o anterior Xperia Z5 Compact. Sim, o desempenho é inferior em algumas situações, mas dificilmente notará isso na prática e o desempenho dos jogos, em particular, se beneficia da resolução comparativamente baixa. Uma desvantagem é a ausência da certificação IP e as sensíveis superfícies de plástico também não são do gosto de qualquer um. No entanto, gostamos das longas durações da bateria.

Não mais gama alta: O Sony Xperia X Compact agora é um aparelho convencional. No entanto, o smartphone compacto não revela problemas sérios e o desempenho também é mais que suficiente na prática, mas a concorrência é realmente forte nesta faixa de preços.

Com um preço de 449 Euros (~$489; preço de rua sugerido ~410 Euros/~$447), o Xperia X Compact enfrenta fortes rivais como o minicarro chefe Honor 8 e o OnePlus 3. Ambos os aparelhos são mais velozes e possuem telas maiores; de outra maneira, as diferenças ainda são muito pequenas. O predecessor Xperia Z5 Compact também ainda está disponível: Ele suporta gravações 4K e a carcaça é mais durável graças à certificação IP. Se estiver procurando um sistema ainda mais compacto com componentes ainda mais velozes, está limitado ao Apple (iPhone SE) desde agora.

Sony Xperia X Compact - 10/21/2016 v5.1
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
46 / 60 → 77%
Peso
94%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
45 / 63 → 71%
Desempenho da aplicação
55 / 70 → 78%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
73%
Médio
76%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)