Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY revisão - Laptop de jogos com RTX 4090

Crème de la Crème. Equipado com um visor móvel RTX 4090, Core i9-13980HX e 240-Hz de 18 polegadas, o Asus oferece os componentes mais rápidos atualmente disponíveis para os jogadores de laptop no Scar 18. Em nossa revisão detalhada, avaliamos o desempenho de todo o pacote em nosso teste e se ele também vale seu alto preço.

Com o ROG Strix Scar 18, o Asus também se junta à tendência do renascimento dos monstros do jogo de 18 polegadas. Para o lançamento, há um novo caso com o RTX 4080e GPU para notebook RTX 4090usado por nossa unidade de teste. Em termos de CPUs, a Asus utiliza a nova série HX, o que significa que você obtém os componentes de laptop mais rápidos atualmente disponíveis no mercado. Não só a caixa grande é totalmente utilizada pelo display QHD+ de 18 polegadas, mas também abriga um novo sistema de resfriamento com três ventiladores, que supostamente mantém os componentes famintos de energia sob controle. No teste a seguir, damos uma olhada detalhada no G834JY-N6005W com RTX 4090, 32 GB de RAM GDDR5, e 2x SSD de 1 TB que está atualmente disponível na Inglaterra.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (ROG Strix Scar 18 G834 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-13980HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.6 GHz, 175 W PL2 / Short Burst, 170 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2090 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 528.49, Advanced Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800 2x32GB
Pantalha
18.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, G-Sync ROG Nebula display, Brilhante: não, HDR, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio port
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30.8 x 399 x 294
Bateria
90 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4 speakers, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
3.1 kg
Preço
4800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.6 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg30.8 mm18.00"2560x1600
89 %
02/2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
89.4 %
02/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.2 %
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.9 %
11/2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
88.3 %
08/2022
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.4 %
03/2023
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440

Caso

O case deve ser marcado com o uso massivo de LEDs RGB e elementos transparentes do case. Ao mesmo tempo, o design básico é relativamente discreto e bastante atraente. Apenas as superfícies transparentes nas laterais parecem um pouco baratas. A unidade base em si é feita de plástico e não dá muita sensação de alta qualidade. Ela também empena levemente ao ser erguida. Por outro lado, a tampa do display de alumínio é significativamente mais estável, dando também proteção suficiente ao display.

O tamanho da caixa é determinado pelo display gigante de 18 polegadas, excedendo significativamente a maioria dos laptops de 17 polegadas. Por outro lado, a unidade base não é tão maciça, fazendo com que o laptop pareça um pouco menor do que realmente é.

Comparação de tamanho

399 mm 294 mm 30.8 mm 3.1 kg395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Equipamento

Todos os portos estão do lado esquerdo e direito da caixa. Infelizmente, isto é menos do que o ideal na operação de desktop, já que é sempre possível ver os cabos. Além disso, ambas as conexões USB-A são colocadas do lado direito em direção ao centro, tornando a posição do cabo menos do que ideal para usuários de mouse com a mão direita. Para os usuários canhotos, o cabo de rede estaria no caminho.

Também temos algumas reclamações sobre o equipamento de conexão. Apenas uma das duas portas USB-C suporta o Thunderbolt, e a outra suporta o Power Delivery com algumas limitações. Em nosso teste, o carregador MacBook Air M1 foi capaz de carregar o laptop a 30 watts, mas sem a notificação no Windows. O Anker Nano 2 de 45 watts não carregou o laptop de forma alguma. No lado positivo, também queremos mencionar a conexão de rede de 2,5 Gbit.

Direita: 2x USB-A
Direita: 2x USB-A
Esquerda: potência, 2,5 Gbit LAN, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C, fone de ouvido
Esquerda: potência, 2,5 Gbit LAN, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C, fone de ouvido

Comunicação

Em termos de opções de comunicação, a Asus oferece uma placa rápida Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 no formato M.2 para conexões sem fio e um chip Realtek RTL8125 para conexões LAN com fio de 2,5 Gbit. Ambos funcionaram sem nenhuma interrupção em nosso teste, mas a placa AX211 não encontrou a rede de 6-GHz de nosso roteador Asus ROG Rapture GT-AX11000. Infelizmente, o Wi-Fi 6E ainda é um hit-and-miss em nosso teste ao encontrar a rede.

Por outro lado, as taxas de dados na rede Wi-Fi 6 são excelentes e sem nenhuma queda.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1466 (748min - 1542max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=182)
1245 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1890 (1843min - 1936max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -26%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=182)
1394 MBit/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1589min - 1741max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)
1477 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=172)
1375 MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1371 (1036min - 1505max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1732 (1685min - 1744max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)
1516 MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1494 (1283min - 1580max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=171)
1492 MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1890 (1843-1936)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (748-1542)

Webcam

A webcam HD 720p embutida infelizmente atende apenas as menores exigências em telefonia de vídeo. Boas condições de luz são importantes aqui, já que os resultados que obtemos com a retroiluminação ou no escuro são dificilmente utilizáveis.

HDR não disponível
HDR não disponível
Quase nenhum detalhe, mesmo em condições normais de luz
Quase nenhum detalhe, mesmo em condições normais de luz
ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W: 14.92 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 34.12 ∆E

Acessórios

A caixa inclui apenas uma "Armor Cap" adicional, que pode ser substituída à esquerda, abaixo do mostrador. A tampa é fixada magneticamente e pode ser destinada a dar-lhe uma opção para personalizar o dispositivo.

Manutenção

Os interiores da série ROG Strix G18 são relativamente de fácil acesso a partir do fundo da caixa. Primeiro é preciso remover os numerosos parafusos Philips e depois soltar os clipes plásticos nas bordas com uma ferramenta de biselar. Isto foi relativamente fácil de fazer com nossa unidade de teste (começando pelos cantos dianteiros) e, felizmente, nenhum dos grampos plásticos quebrou ao abrir o estojo.

Dentro do laptop, vemos dois slots M.2-2280 para SSDs PCIe (ambos ocupados para o sistema RAID-0), um slot M.2 para a placa WLAN, e dois slots de memória (ambos também ocupados) para um máximo de 64 GB de RAM GDDR5. Todos os ventiladores também são acessíveis e podem ser limpos facilmente. A bateria é aparafusada na caixa, portanto, também deve ser relativamente fácil de substituir.

Garantia

A Asus oferece apenas a garantia habitual de um ano (dois anos para os modelos oferecidos na Alemanha). Não é mencionada uma garantia para peças de reposição ou algo semelhante.

Input Devices

Teclado

Além do bloco de números, o teclado de tamanho completo usado aqui também inclui cinco teclas especiais acima da linha de dupla utilização F1-F12. As teclas de pintinho oferecem um curso de chave suficiente e um curso silencioso. Durante o primeiro teste de digitação, o autor alcançou umas boas 85 palavras por minuto com 96% de precisão. A retroiluminação RGB integrada das chaves separadas pode ser personalizada com numerosas animações. No teste de capotagem n-key, não vemos nenhuma limitação (24 teclas simultâneas, no máximo, atingidas).

Touchpad

O grande touchpad oferece uma superfície de vidro e excelentes características de deslizamento. Multitouch funcionou sem falhas em nosso teste, e os 4/5 inferiores da área também podem ser clicados confortavelmente. No entanto, um clique no canto inferior direito é muitas vezes reconhecido como um botão direito do mouse, levando a algumas entradas erradas.

Mostrar

O novo visor de 18 polegadas pontua com inúmeros recursos como G-Sync, 240 Hz, QHD+, tempos de resposta rápidos de 3 ms e cobertura de espaço colorido DCI-P3 de acordo com a folha de especificações. Em termos de brilho, o grande visor de 18 polegadas não atinge exatamente as 500 lêndeas prometidas. Entretanto, o brilho é definitivamente sempre suficiente em ambientes internos, e a distribuição de brilho também é boa, com 86%. Nossa unidade de teste não mostra nenhum sangramento visível de luz de fundo.

423
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NE180QDM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 467.7 cd/m² Minimum: 25.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 490 cd/m²
Contraste: 907:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.97
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
84.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.161
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
0%
2%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
97.2
96.9
0%
94.9
-2%
97.1
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.8
0%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.9
85.3
0%
92.4
9%
84.8
0%
Response Times
15%
-410%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.41 ?(2.57, 2.84)
4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1)
22%
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
-610%
5.7 ?(2.7, 3)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
8.62 ?(3.68, 4.94, n)
8 ?(3.8, 4.2)
7%
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
-209%
10.1 ?(5, 5.1)
-17%
PWM Frequency
2380 ?(100)
Screen
22%
74253%
29%
Brightness middle
490
549.6
12%
606
24%
320
-35%
Brightness
468
524
12%
602
29%
303
-35%
Brightness Distribution
86
89
3%
93
8%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.54
0.53
2%
0.0001
100%
0.3
44%
Contrast
907
1037
14%
6060000
668037%
1067
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.97
3.32
33%
4.8
3%
1.1
78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.02
6.63
40%
8.2
26%
2.7
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.97
2.7
9%
1.8
39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.2
2
72%
6.5
10%
1.1
85%
Gamma
2.161 102%
2.29 96%
2.63 84%
2.13 103%
CCT
6515 100%
6319 103%
6596 99%
6599 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 16%
24615% / 47676%
6% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

O espaço de cor medido cobre o espaço de cor Display-P3 até 97% e, portanto, também é adequado para tarefas exigentes (após uma calibração). Em termos de precisão de cor, o resultado depende da pré-seleção utilizada. Na ferramenta Armory Crate, a Asus oferece quatro modos diferentes no GameVisual: Native, sRGB, DCI-P3, e Display P3. No modo Nativo, a exibição de nossa unidade de teste tinha uma coloração azul facilmente perceptível e mensurável que também se manifestava como um valor ΔE de quase 5. Após a calibração com nossa i1Pro 3, alcançamos um resultado significativamente melhorado - particularmente também nos valores extremos. Após a calibração, o visor também é adequado para o processamento de imagens.

ColorChecker Modo nativo
ColorChecker Modo nativo
Modo ColorChecker sRGB
Modo ColorChecker sRGB
Mostrador ColorChecker modo P3
Mostrador ColorChecker modo P3
ColorChecker após nossa calibração
ColorChecker após nossa calibração
Escala de cinza após nossa calibração
Escala de cinza após nossa calibração
Modo nativo em escala de cinza
Modo nativo em escala de cinza
Modo sRGB em escala de cinza
Modo sRGB em escala de cinza
Mostrador em escala de cinza modo P3
Mostrador em escala de cinza modo P3
Tela colorida Gamut modo P3
Tela colorida Gamut modo P3

No painel NE180QDM-NZ2 usado aqui, o brilho do visor não é controlado via PWM, e não notamos nenhuma cintilação com nosso dispositivo de medição (em todos os níveis de brilho). Conseguimos confirmar o prometido tempo de resposta de 3 ms durante as mudanças de cinza. Para conseguir isto, o Asus usa um overdrive mínimo, mas não notamos nenhum efeito negativo. Em combinação com a taxa de atualização de 240-Hz, a tela é, portanto, ideal para jogos.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.68 ms rise
↘ 4.94 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.57 ms rise
↘ 2.84 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Graças à superfície da tela mate e ao bom brilho máximo, o ROG Strix Scar 18 pode, teoricamente, também ser facilmente utilizado ao ar livre. Embora quase 500 lêndeas sejam insuficientes para o sol brilhante do verão, elas são bastante suficientes na sombra ou no sol da noite, como em nossa imagem.

Exibição ao ar livre
Exibição ao ar livre

Graças ao painel de nível IPS, os ângulos de visão são excelentes. A perda de brilho dos ângulos de visão íngreme permanece dentro dos limites, e as distorções de cor não são perceptíveis subjetivamente.

Ângulos de visualização
Ângulos de visualização
Ângulos de visualização
Ângulos de visualização

Desempenho

Nossa unidade de teste do Scar 18 é capaz de pontuar várias vezes nas medidas de desempenho. A Asus usa a placa gráfica móvel atualmente mais rápida, a GeForce RTX 4090, permitindo também o consumo máximo de energia de 175 watts. O Asus também não cortou os cantos com o processador, usando o modelo top móvel da Intel. O é o modelo de topo móvel da Intel.Intel Core i9-13980HXé baseado na nova série Raptor Lake, oferecendo 24 núcleos e um impulso máximo de 5,6 GHz considerável. A quantidade de armazenamento também é considerável com 32 GB de RAM DDR5. Entretanto, com 4800 MB/s a velocidade de armazenamento é ligeiramente menor do que em alguns modelos dos concorrentes. E finalmente, há também dois SSDs de 1 TB em um sistema RAID-0.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Armazenamento CPU-Z
Armazenamento CPU-Z
Armazenamento CPU-Z
Armazenamento CPU-Z
Medidas sob carga extrema
Medidas sob carga extrema

Condições de teste

Executamos nossos testes de desempenho no modo Turbo e no modo Ultimate GPU. Usando isto, a conexão RTX 4090 é fixada via MUX e overclocked minimamente em 50 MHz. Além disso, também testamos o modo Performance (padrão no estado de entrega) e o modo GPU Standard (comutação MSHybrid Optimus).

Processador

OIntel Core i9-13980HX é o atual top model da Intel para laptops. Ele é baseado na nova série Raptor Lake e é tecnicamente comparável com o Processador central i9-13900K para desktop. A CPU contém 8 núcleos Raptor Cove Performance com Hyper-Threading e uma velocidade de relógio de até 5,6 GHz. Os núcleos menores Gracemont Efficiency não oferecem Hyper-Threading e têm uma velocidade de relógio de até 4 GHz. Ao todo, a CPU é capaz de usar 32 MB de cache Nível 2 e é especificada pela Intel a 157 watts (PL2) e 55 watts (PL1) TDP. O Asus especifica que a CPU funciona a 65 watts (PL1), mas os valores PL1 e PL2 no HWInfo64 mostram 175 watts. Nos valores de referência, a CPU começa a 175 watts e depois corre para o limite térmico a 96 °C (205 °F), após o que o TDP é baixado para 135 watts. No modo silencioso, o TDP é baixado para 100W / 65W, levando também a um desempenho significativamente reduzido.

Em nossos benchmarks de processador, a i9-13980HX na ROG Strix 18 também é capaz de se colocar um pouco à frente das CPUs 13900HX e 13950HX dos concorrentes. No entanto, este é apenas o caso do modo Turbo, e no modo Performance, o Strix Scar 18 só se coloca no meio do campo das novas CPUs 13000HX. Mas mesmo assim, os dispositivos mais antigos com processadores i9-12950HX ainda são claramente ultrapassados.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4366 (4298.3-4875.08)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon Intel Core i9-13900K: Ø4779 (4708.1-5265.93)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
87.3 pt
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
78.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
75.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
74.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
72.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
71.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
70.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
70.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
70.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
64.8 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
60.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
56.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
51.2 pt
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
49.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
38229 Points +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
33277 Points +5%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
32592 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
31572 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (28301 - 33052, n=11)
30305 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30162 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28707 (26191.7min - 28706.8max) Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28010 (26406.1min - 28009.8max) Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26703 Points -15%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28681 (25585.5min - 28680.9max) Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
28301 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points -15%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
23124 Points -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
19965 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19514 Points -38%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
16277 (14241.1min - 16276.6max) Points -48%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
2272 Points +6%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
2203 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2140 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2100 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1825 - 2169, n=9)
2081 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2076 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2055 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2043 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points -5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1907 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1903 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1813 Points -15%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1465 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
14502 Points +20%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
13415 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
12648 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
12073 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (10353 - 12437, n=10)
11540 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11500 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11289 Points -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
10919 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
10353 Points -14%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8828 Points -27%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
7511 Points -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points -39%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6625 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
870 Points +6%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
853 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
824 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
803 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
799 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
797 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (717 - 825, n=10)
789 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
788 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
756 Points -8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
742 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
741 Points -10%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
703 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points -15%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
5959 Points +25%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
5321 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
5227 (4889.98min - 5226.71max) Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4913 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4875 (4298.3min - 4875.08max) Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4819 (4429.68min - 4819.28max) Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4781 (4684.94min - 4780.69max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (4358 - 5172, n=11)
4708 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4481 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4358 (4165.8min - 4357.77max) Points -9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3562 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
3101 (2605.18min - 3101.02max) Points -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points -35%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
2769 (2236.26min - 2768.74max) Points -42%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
328 Points +5%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
319 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
312 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
307 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (289 - 312, n=11)
303 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
300 Points -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
297 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
295 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
294 Points -6%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
280 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
274 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -14%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
266 Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
199.8 Seconds * -94%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
193 Seconds * -87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
175 Seconds * -70%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
150.5 Seconds * -46%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
112 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
111 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
111 Seconds * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (97 - 136, n=10)
109.3 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
103 Seconds *
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
101 Seconds * +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
100 Seconds * +3%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
82 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
146984 MIPS +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
127295 MIPS +3%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
127201 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
123833 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122254 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
118715 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (104616 - 129804, n=10)
118278 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
116665 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
115367 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS -12%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86541 MIPS -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
77003 MIPS -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76978 MIPS -38%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
65637 MIPS -47%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
7539 MIPS +6%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
7255 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
7084 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7035 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
7018 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (6230 - 7163, n=10)
6915 MIPS -2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6897 MIPS -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6880 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6800 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6357 MIPS -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6255 MIPS -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6122 MIPS -14%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6022 MIPS -15%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
24143 Points +16%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
22448 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21058 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
20847 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20784 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
20634 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (18475 - 22200, n=10)
20092 Points -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
20036 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
18918 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -13%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16448 Points -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
15144 Points -27%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
14197 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13567 Points -35%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
2287 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2108 Points 0%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
2106 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2099 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1796 - 2139, n=10)
2051 Points -2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2043 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2035 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2025 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2023 Points -4%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1949 Points -7%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1914 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1868 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)
1808 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
41.1 fps +23%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
34.5 fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
33.4 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32.7 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31.9 fps -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (27 - 33.4, n=9)
31.1 fps -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
31 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30.9 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
29.4 fps -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps -14%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
26 fps -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
22.5 fps -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.2 fps -37%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
18.6 fps -44%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -32%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46.5 s * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
46 s * -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 s * -22%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
43.7 s * -21%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
43.4 s * -21%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (35 - 51.4, n=10)
43 s * -19%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42.4 s * -18%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
41.6 s * -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
41.1 s * -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
36 s *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
34.7 s * +4%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
30.3 s * +16%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4699 sec * -24%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX
0.4454 sec * -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
0.4251 sec * -12%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4239 sec * -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4033 sec * -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3979 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10)
0.3959 sec * -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.3955 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.3917 sec * -3%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K
0.3911 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3866 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.3793 sec *
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K
0.3507 sec * +8%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
24410
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
25072 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
11940
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
85088
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
125983 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
17400 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
55.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
204.24 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
312 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
322 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4781 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
99.6 pt
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
79.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
75.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
74.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
54.8 pt
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
47.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
35661 KRay/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
28957 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
28701 KRay/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
28226 KRay/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
26763 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
26741 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (21332 - 29553, n=9)
26707 KRay/s -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25949 KRay/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
25857 KRay/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25064 KRay/s -13%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
20004 KRay/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18585 KRay/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
17542 KRay/s -39%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
15499 KRay/s -46%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
175130 Points +27%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144303 Points +4%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
141111 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138190 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133668 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (108001 - 148168, n=9)
132982 Points -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129286 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128498 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127993 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125944 Points -9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110093 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93302 Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86936 Points -37%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
77846 Points -44%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
8789 MB/s +26%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7093 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6949 MB/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
6810 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6750 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6567 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (5264 - 7142, n=9)
6559 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6350 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6338 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6265 MB/s -10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5123 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4316 MB/s -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4179 MB/s -40%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
3426 MB/s -51%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
159134 Points +13%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
155930 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141905 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141427 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139649 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (126758 - 143409, n=9)
138011 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137876 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136871 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134227 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133226 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
109168 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104422 Points -26%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
103714 Points -27%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102056 Points -28%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
19923 Points +16%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
17400 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17117 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17057 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16291 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (13785 - 17117, n=9)
16075 Points -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16073 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16023 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15813 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15807 Points -8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12924 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12175 Points -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11502 Points -33%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
10134 Points -41%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
88592 Points +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71038 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70739 Points
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
70668 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66753 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (53398 - 73758, n=9)
66568 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65558 Points -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64736 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64078 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63308 Points -11%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52105 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47772 Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42613 Points -40%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
37146 Points -47%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
295323 MB/s +120%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
183146 MB/s +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
167077 MB/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136551 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134166 MB/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
133509 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
127698 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (105169 - 136520, n=9)
126745 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126434 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125644 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122159 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
121924 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
107334 MB/s -20%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
72599 MB/s -46%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
2434 MB/s +20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2030 MB/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
1965 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1936 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1513 - 2039, n=9)
1894 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1891 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1850 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1829 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1820 MB/s -10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1393 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1208 MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1205 MB/s -41%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
996 MB/s -51%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
19396 KRay/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15573 KRay/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15540 KRay/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
15363 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
14722 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (11431 - 16325, n=9)
14483 KRay/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14479 KRay/s -7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14066 KRay/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
13844 KRay/s -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13798 KRay/s -11%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10864 KRay/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10062 KRay/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9507 KRay/s -39%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
8455 KRay/s -46%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50834 MPixel/s +15%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49634 MPixel/s +13%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
48784 MPixel/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48626 MPixel/s +10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47710 MPixel/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (37069 - 52949, n=9)
46025 MPixel/s +5%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
45051 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
44238 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
44016 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
43972 MPixel/s 0%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
42472 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42438 MPixel/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
40896 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36679 MPixel/s -17%

Desempenho do sistema

O poderoso hardware também é capaz de pontuar no desempenho geral do sistema. No PCMark 10, o Scar 18 atinge uma posição superior que atualmente é apenas pouco ultrapassada pelos poderosos desktops e o MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI. No CrossMark, o resultado também está na classe superior. Mesmo que alguns laptops sejam capazes de se posicionar à frente do Strix Scar 18, a distância é muito pequena a um máximo de 4% (com o MSI Titan GT77 12UHS atualmente como o laptop mais rápido, e o desktop mais rápido alcançando um resultado 24% maior).

Na referência de armazenamento, você pode ver facilmente o impacto do armazenamento DDR5-4800. Os sistemas com a memória principal mais rápida DDR5-5600 como o Razer Blade 16 ainda são capazes de alcançar uma vantagem significativa. Esta é uma das poucas áreas onde o Asus não usa os componentes mais rápidos disponíveis, mas o impacto é relativamente baixo na prática.

PCMark 10 / Score
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
9118 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8884 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (8650 - 9068, n=4)
8810 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8764 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points -11%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7609 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -18%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6993 Points -20%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
6883 Points -21%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11761 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11703 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11683 Points
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
11598 Points
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
11465 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (11215 - 11644, n=3)
11367 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10718 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10306 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9761 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
10988 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10788 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10125 - 11067, n=3)
10532 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9856 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9851 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9716 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9682 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9645 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
8054 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
16424 Points
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
16145 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (15052 - 16012, n=3)
15589 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11450 Points
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10611 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10319 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10003 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9822 Points
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
9583 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-13900K, Corsair MP600
2589 Points +24%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
2263 Points +9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2169 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2139 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2127 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2112 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2080 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1935 - 2176, n=4)
2053 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2019 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1993 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=168, last 2 years)
1877 Points -10%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
1801 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -23%
CrossMark / Productivity
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-13900K, Corsair MP600
2386 Points +25%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
2059 Points +8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2047 Points +7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1977 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1969 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1966 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1909 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1764 - 2005, n=4)
1885 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1863 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1820 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=168, last 2 years)
1787 Points -6%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
1684 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -21%
CrossMark / Creativity
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-13900K, Corsair MP600
2794 Points +14%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
2625 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2455 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2423 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2267 - 2469, n=4)
2395 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2390 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2387 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
2384 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2336 Points -5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2328 Points -5%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
2042 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=168, last 2 years)
2042 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -27%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-13900K, Corsair MP600
2630 Points +61%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2090 Points +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1936 Points +18%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-13900K, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
1929 Points +18%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1891 Points +16%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1861 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=168, last 2 years)
1700 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1556 - 1904, n=4)
1670 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1634 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1556 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1528 Points -6%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
1514 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -18%
PCMark 10 Score
8764 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77096 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s +14%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
75188 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62189 - 80776, n=9)
71190 MB/s +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70863 MB/s +5%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
68722 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68273 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67828 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67561 MB/s
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
64170 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63831 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59222 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86207 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85073 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s +14%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
83185 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62624 - 89096, n=9)
76728 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74607 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74530 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74518 MB/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
73392 MB/s -2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
72930 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69256 MB/s -7%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
68608 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
63097 MB/s -15%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62807 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75814 MB/s +12%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
73987 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70939 MB/s +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (59912 - 79917, n=9)
69396 MB/s +3%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
68948 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67490 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67449 MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67353 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67225 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65800 MB/s -2%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
65376 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61557 MB/s -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60389 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -11%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
93.4 ns * -5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.9 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.3 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (79.4 - 93.2, n=9)
87.5 ns * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.3 ns * +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.2 ns * +5%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
84.5 ns * +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.5 ns * +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.9 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +7%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
77 ns * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

Nas latências do DPC, o laptop Asus só coloca o Asus no meio do campo de todos os laptops testados. De acordo com LatencyMon, o driver Nvidia está em falta aqui, o que pode criar alguns problemas em aplicações em tempo real. Executamos nossos testes em modo Turbo com GPU Ultimate (sem Optimus), que teoricamente é mais adequado do que o modo híbrido ou modo de economia de energia. Infelizmente, o fraco desempenho do DPC não é uma exceção nesta classe de dispositivos.

A primeira execução de nossa seqüência de testes mostra latências ainda mais altas.
A primeira execução de nossa seqüência de testes mostra latências ainda mais altas.
A segunda corrida é melhor, mas ainda é muito alta para aplicações em tempo real.
A segunda corrida é melhor, mas ainda é muito alta para aplicações em tempo real.
O motorista da Nvidia é o principal culpado.
O motorista da Nvidia é o principal culpado.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs * -330%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3413 μs * -212%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * -124%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX
1731.9 μs * -58%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1684.6 μs * -54%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1169.3 μs * -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1095 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +60%

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

A Asus usa dois SSDs Samsung PM9A1 rápidos, cada um com 1 TB de armazenamento, em um sistema RAID-0 no Scar 18 G834JY-N6005W. Mesmo que a velocidade seja ligeiramente aumentada com isto, a probabilidade de falha e o consumo de energia também aumenta. Entretanto, na comparação com o Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H com o mesmo sistema RAID, o Asus Scar é ultrapassado - mesmo por uma margem significativa. Mas isto não se deve a problemas térmicos, e o desempenho permanece constante sob carga constante.

2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 7888MB/s
Sequential Write: 5041MB/s
4K Read: 58MB/s
4K Write: 114.7MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1011MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1072MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.044ms
Access Time Write: 0.035ms
Score Read: 1858Points
Score Write: 1691Points
Score Total: 4364Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
76 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
73.8 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
73.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.1 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
64.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
64.2 pt
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
59.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
57.2 pt
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
57.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
54.6 pt
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W -11!
Corsair MP600
54.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
49.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
48.1 pt
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
47.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake -11!
 
35.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5598 (5462.22min - 5597.85max) MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5568 (5541.55min - 5568.34max) MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
5544 (5525.64min - 5543.85max) MB/s +14%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (4837 - 5544, n=3)
5074 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4842 (4719.64min - 4842.11max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4837 (4785.7min - 4837.08max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4525 (4498.41min - 4525.41max) MB/s -7%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
3912 (3515.15min - 3912.09max) MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3889 (3873.65min - 3888.73max) MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s -21%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3713 (3643.38min - 3713.01max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3536 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
3180 (3109.94min - 3179.84max) MB/s -34%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
2866 (2835.56min - 2866.32max) MB/s -41%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2428 (2422.4min - 2427.66max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7667 (7620.91min - 7667.19max) MB/s +83%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7533 (7482.85min - 7532.79max) MB/s +79%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7531 (7479min - 7530.7max) MB/s +79%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
7175 (1565.94min - 7174.57max) MB/s +71%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (3988 - 7667, n=3)
5285 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4378 (4355.78min - 4378.43max) MB/s +4%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
4256 (3822.69min - 4255.75max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4199 (3998.61min - 4199.12max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
3988 (3785.76min - 3988.15max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3825 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3798 (3750.39min - 3798.15max) MB/s -10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3706 (3661.84min - 3706.09max) MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
3434 (3027.24min - 3434.35max) MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -23%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2118 (2104.69min - 2117.7max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12556 (4870.54min - 12556.3max) MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
12143 (11574.5min - 12143max) MB/s +13%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (10774 - 12143, n=3)
11432 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
11380 (9073.96min - 11379.6max) MB/s +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11242 (10740.3min - 11242.2max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10774 (9137.92min - 10774max) MB/s
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
7116 (6584.47min - 7116.06max) MB/s -34%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6810 (6260.27min - 6809.87max) MB/s -37%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6695 (6233.69min - 6694.56max) MB/s -38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6682 (5778.28min - 6681.95max) MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
6637 (5645.11min - 6636.65max) MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6381 MB/s -41%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
5828 (5235.35min - 5828.4max) MB/s -46%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2599 (2360.66min - 2599.21max) MB/s -76%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10261 (10045.2min - 10261.4max) MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10203 (10182.9min - 10203.3max) MB/s +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9942 (9912.92min - 9941.76max) MB/s +18%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
9136 (9087.94min - 9136.03max) MB/s +9%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (8297 - 10203, n=3)
8968 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8404 (8165.05min - 8403.71max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8297 (8100.88min - 8297.17max) MB/s -1%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
6135 (6096.84min - 6134.8max) MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
4985 (4706.66min - 4985.24max) MB/s -41%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4959 (4940min - 4958.51max) MB/s -41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4923.06min - 4943.2max) MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4805 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4426 (4263.58min - 4426.04max) MB/s -47%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -50%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2233 (2227.59min - 2232.63max) MB/s -73%
4k q1 t1 read
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
344 (342.25min - 343.75max) MB/s +498%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.3 (93.25min - 95.25max) MB/s +66%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
90.6 (90.17min - 90.55max) MB/s +58%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
86.5 (82.21min - 86.46max) MB/s +50%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.1 (79.37min - 83.07max) MB/s +45%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83 (80.23min - 83.02max) MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79 (77.42min - 79.03max) MB/s +37%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
74.5 (73.46min - 74.52max) MB/s +30%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (56.9 - 90.6, n=3)
68.3 MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.7 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
57.5 (57.09min - 57.53max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
56.9 (56.27min - 56.9max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
46.6 (45.38min - 46.63max) MB/s -19%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
45.4 (43.55min - 45.41max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
320 (304.51min - 320.11max) MB/s +209%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
286 (284.91min - 285.72max) MB/s +176%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
280 (267.82min - 279.79max) MB/s +170%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
255 (243.79min - 255.25max) MB/s +146%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
237 (232.48min - 236.93max) MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +116%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
221 (218.91min - 220.66max) MB/s +113%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s +112%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
213 (205.52min - 212.72max) MB/s +105%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
192 (183.56min - 191.99max) MB/s +85%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (102.4 - 237, n=3)
147.7 MB/s +42%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
133.3 (131.44min - 133.32max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
108.4 (106.69min - 108.4max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
103.7 (103.17min - 103.74max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
102.4 (101.83min - 102.41max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4100 (4085.58min - 4100.1max) MB/s +477%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4075 (4059.83min - 4075.02max) MB/s +473%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3203 (3180.36min - 3203.41max) MB/s +350%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s +338%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2580 MB/s +263%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2300 (2296.38min - 2300.31max) MB/s +223%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2148 (1952.04min - 2148.3max) MB/s +202%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1982 (1800.55min - 1982.03max) MB/s +179%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1469 (1266.81min - 1469.47max) MB/s +107%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
1190 (1106.16min - 1189.5max) MB/s +67%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
1176 (1157.2min - 1176.4max) MB/s +65%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (706 - 1982, n=3)
1133 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
973 (941.21min - 972.98max) MB/s +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
711 (692.26min - 710.64max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
706 (698.68min - 706.08max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3519.01min - 3536.66max) MB/s +911%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3503 (3468.77min - 3503.3max) MB/s +901%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
Corsair MP600
2232 (2225.04min - 2231.57max) MB/s +538%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2209 (1041.25min - 2208.74max) MB/s +531%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2146 MB/s +513%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2101 (1969.73min - 2101.4max) MB/s +500%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1842 (1678.82min - 1841.75max) MB/s +426%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1424 (1251.47min - 1423.75max) MB/s +307%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s +266%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
1243 (1141.93min - 1243.27max) MB/s +255%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (342 - 1842, n=3)
845 MB/s +141%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
538 (527.91min - 538.21max) MB/s +54%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
460 (453.59min - 459.8max) MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
350 (343.49min - 350.45max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
342 (332.27min - 341.53max) MB/s -2%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8951 Points +105%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
8263 Points +89%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8224 Points +88%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7745 Points +77%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7498 Points +72%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6816 Points +56%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
6691 Points +53%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (4119 - 6691, n=3)
5058 Points +16%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4850 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4364 Points
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
4244 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4119 Points -6%
Score Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3490 Points +88%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3399 Points +83%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points +78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 Points +72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3012 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2728 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2498 Points +34%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (1715 - 2728, n=3)
2100 Points +13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2035 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1858 Points
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
1792 Points -4%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
1722 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1715 Points -8%
Score Write
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
5665 Points +235%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3882 Points +130%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3468 Points +105%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3109 Points +84%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3013 Points +78%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2631 Points +56%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2566 Points +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points +44%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (1656 - 2631, n=3)
1993 Points +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1877 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1691 Points
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
1688 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1656 Points -2%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9971 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
9681.3 MB/s +23%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9511 MB/s +21%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (6844 - 9681, n=3)
8138 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7888 MB/s
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
7378.74 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
6844 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5770.79 MB/s -27%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
5664 MB/s -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5429.33 MB/s -31%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s -35%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5053.82 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4955 MB/s -37%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8590 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8205.5 MB/s +63%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7181 MB/s +42%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
6301.74 MB/s +25%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (4091 - 8206, n=3)
5779 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
5041 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4091 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064.76 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3951.34 MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3661 MB/s -27%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3628.78 MB/s -28%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
3081 MB/s -39%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s -39%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.9 MB/s +48%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.47 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
80.52 MB/s +39%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
77.71 MB/s +34%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.8 MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.43 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
69.72 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.8 MB/s +15%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (56.4 - 80.5, n=3)
65 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
58 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
56.4 MB/s -3%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
54.93 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -14%
4K Write
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
272.11 MB/s +137%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
247.61 MB/s +116%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
241.69 MB/s +111%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s +83%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
205.06 MB/s +79%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
204.33 MB/s +78%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
197.41 MB/s +72%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
177.9 MB/s +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s +26%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (112.8 - 197.4, n=3)
141.6 MB/s +23%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
130.56 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
114.7 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
112.8 MB/s -2%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2843.31 MB/s +181%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2811.14 MB/s +178%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s +171%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2558.72 MB/s +153%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1942.29 MB/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1929 MB/s +91%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1679.76 MB/s +66%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (974 - 1680, n=3)
1222 MB/s +21%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
1148.16 MB/s +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1011 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1011 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
974 MB/s -4%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
928.92 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Write
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
5085.1 MB/s +374%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3271.86 MB/s +205%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2856.24 MB/s +166%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2535 MB/s +136%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1949.41 MB/s +82%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s +81%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1929.02 MB/s +80%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1613.52 MB/s +51%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (1072 - 1614, n=3)
1273 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1134 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1072 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
981 MB/s -8%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
927.41 MB/s -13%
Access Time Read
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
0.104 ms * -136%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05353 ms * -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.044 ms *
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
0.043 ms * +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.036 ms * +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.036 ms * +18%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (0.021 - 0.044, n=3)
0.03367 ms * +23%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.03 ms * +32%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +36%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.026 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms * +50%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.021 ms * +52%
Access Time Write
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
 
0.089 ms * -154%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -134%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.056 ms * -60%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04669 ms * -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.036 ms * -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.035 ms *
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
  (0.021 - 0.036, n=3)
0.03067 ms * +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms * +34%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms * +34%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.021 ms * +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * +46%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.017 ms * +51%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
0.013 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06251250187525003125375043755000562562506875750081258750937510000106251125011875Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø10730 (8845.37-10809.96)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø12096 (6572.54-12452.47)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø1479 (639.61-10176.63)

Placa Gráfica

A peça de exposição no Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 é claramente o Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 GPU para notebook. Embora o nome sugira uma semelhança com o GPU de mesa RTX 4090a versão móvel está relacionada com o Desktop RTX 4080 (mesmo chip), e o desempenho permanece inferior ao de um desktop RTX 4070 Ti. Mas, pelo menos, a Asus oferece a versão mais rápida do RTX 4090 Mobile com 175 watts TGP (150 watts + 25 watts Dynamic Boost) e até mesmo overclock a GPU ligeiramente em 50 MHz.

Em comparação com o RTX 4090 noMSI Titan GT77 HX 13VIo Strix G18 ainda mal se posiciona atrás, apesar do overclocking. Os laptops RTX 4080 também são claramente superados, e os laptops com o antigo GPU para laptop RTX 3080 Timodelo superior permanecem muito atrás.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
99 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
97.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
94 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
93.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
89.4 pt
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
88.4 pt
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
87.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
81.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
61.8 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
61.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
56.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
55.5 pt
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
48.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
71432 Points +12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
69211 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (56764 - 73027, n=36)
65041 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
63818 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
61505 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
60038 Points -6%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
59799 Points -6%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
59478 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points -11%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
44393 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
44134 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)
40451 Points -37%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
39733 Points -38%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
35376 Points -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
49247 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
48101 Points
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
46980 Points -2%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
46469 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40220 - 53059, n=34)
46315 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
46240 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
46003 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
43525 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
32505 Points -32%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
31732 Points -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)
29442 Points -39%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
28743 Points -40%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
26260 Points -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22254 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21786 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
21167 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (17620 - 23292, n=36)
20991 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
19758 Points -7%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
19367 Points -9%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
18911 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18417 Points -13%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
12865 Points -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
12791 Points -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)
12060 Points -43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11683 Points -45%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
9568 Points -55%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
67702 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
46985 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
277937 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
70984 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
36408 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
24278 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
20166 pontos
Ajuda
Blender - v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
25 Seconds * -150%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
24 Seconds * -140%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=177, last 2 years)
23.2 Seconds * -132%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
23 Seconds * -130%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
20 Seconds * -100%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
15 Seconds * -50%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * -50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15 Seconds * -50%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
13 Seconds * -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
12 Seconds * -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=33)
11.9 Seconds * -19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11 Seconds * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
11 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
10 Seconds *
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1261 mpaths
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
1252 mpaths -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1220 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (873 - 1334, n=25)
1215 mpaths -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1208 mpaths -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
937 mpaths -26%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
867 mpaths -31%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
855 mpaths -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=185, last 2 years)
601 mpaths -52%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
526 mpaths -58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
513 mpaths -59%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
3639 mpaths +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
3590 mpaths
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
3542 mpaths -1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
3533 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1982 - 3824, n=27)
3462 mpaths -4%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
2904 mpaths -19%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
2741 mpaths -24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
2655 mpaths -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=125, last 2 years)
2042 mpaths -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
1893 mpaths -47%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
1860 mpaths -48%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
171 mpaths -95%
GPU CUDA
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
2644 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
2640 mpaths 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
2582 mpaths -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
2568 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1454 - 2797, n=27)
2528 mpaths -4%
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i9-13900K
2111 mpaths -20%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-13900K
2055 mpaths -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
1945 mpaths -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=128, last 2 years)
1471 mpaths -44%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
1333 mpaths -50%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
1333 mpaths -50%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
120 mpaths -95%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho nos jogos

Os benchmarks dos jogos revelam um quadro semelhante ao já existente nos benchmarks sintéticos. Como uma característica especial, a série RTX 4000 agora também oferece suporte para DLSS 3 com geração de quadros. Nos jogos suportados, o RTX 4090 é capaz de dar um impulso significativo nas taxas de quadros aqui. Isto também torna possível efeitos de traçado de raio em 4K com taxas de quadros suaves. Entretanto, os 240 Hz da tela só podem ser totalmente utilizados em jogos menos exigentes na resolução nativa de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels.

Performance Rating - Percent
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
98.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86.6 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63 pt
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
62.4 pt
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
161.5 (2.84min, 125P1) fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.5 (3.79min, 100P1) fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.5 (4.99min, 90.9P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.3 (4.69min, 100P1) fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
140.9 (3.54min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.5 (3.4min, 100P1) fps -3%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
136 (4.34min, 90.9P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.7 (9.75min, 76.9P1) fps -10%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
107.1 fps -24%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
102.6 (9.38min, 71.4P1) fps -27%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187.4 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
180.7 (119min, 128.92P1) fps +2%
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
180.6 fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
177.6 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
167.5 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
162.4 fps -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
157.8 fps -11%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
132 fps -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.5 fps -33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.2 fps -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)
111.1 fps -37%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
107.8 fps -39%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
373 (29.9min, 272P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
366 (29.1min, 263P1) fps
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
359 (170.6min, 261P1) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
350 (32.1min, 230P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
345 (59.4min, 242P1) fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
318 (29.2min, 228P1) fps -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
211 (14.1min, 155.4P1) fps -42%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
209 (104.8min, 154.1P1) fps -43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
208 (39.5min, 154.8P1) fps -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
206 fps -44%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
177.9 (33.9min, 130.7P1) fps -51%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
216.6 (187min) fps +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
190.2 (160.9min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187.3 (160.7min) fps -2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
185.9 (157.5min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179 (152.4min) fps -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
178.6 (153.9min) fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
177.3 (150.3min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
169.8 (147.2min) fps -11%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
165.7 (145min) fps -13%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
152.9 (133.1min) fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.4 fps -25%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
148.8 fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142.8 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.4 fps -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.9 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135.7 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135.5 fps -5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.2 fps -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.1 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131.8 fps -8%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.1 fps -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.2 fps -19%
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
107.8 fps -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.7 fps -29%

Em nosso teste de carga com o The Witcher 3 e também no teste de estresse 3DMark Time Spy, o Asus G834JY mantém um desempenho estável sem nenhuma queda. As flutuações visíveis no The Witcher 3 são devidas às mudanças entre o dia e a noite.

O desempenho Witcher 3 1080p Ultra 60 min
O desempenho Witcher 3 1080p Ultra 60 min

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

No graph data
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K DLSS4K
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 516 314
GTA V (2015) 187.4 185.7 184.8 141.3 139.1 175.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 237 207.7 201.75 190.2 178.6
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 169
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 224 208 177.6 146.7 90.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 211 186.8 142.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 197 181 172 158 153 107
Strange Brigade (2018) 496 403 386 366 292 154.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 143.7 121.2 87.3
Control (2019) 184.4 123.2 72.6
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 184 154 145 127 92
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 74 74 96.8 51.2
Battlefield 2042 (2021) 172.6 138.9 85.4
Halo Infinite (2021) 128.9 77 57.3
Elden Ring (2022) 60 60 60 60 60 60
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 119.7 94.5
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 290 242 138.3
F1 22 (2022) 319 308 273 124.5 75 42.4
FIFA 23 (2022) 183.7 182.6 162.4
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 96.8 72 82.3 41
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 108.2 103.1 62.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 170 127 112 81
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 109.1 103.8 73.2
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 124.2 111.8 84.3
High On Life (2023) 180.3 120.2 52
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 137.6 96.6 49

Emissões

Níveis de ruídos

Um dos três ventiladores
Um dos três ventiladores

Sob carga, os três ventiladores embutidos estão lutando audivelmente com os componentes poderosos. Embora as características de ruído permaneçam muito confortáveis, até 55,8 dB (ventiladores a 4900, 5500 e 6400 RPM) ainda é muito barulhento. Durante os jogos, o som dos bons alto-falantes pode ser afogado um pouco, sugerindo que você use fones de ouvido aqui. Se você usar o display de 240 Hz nos jogos e ele atingir altas taxas de quadros, nossa unidade de teste infelizmente produz um lamento de bobina claramente perceptível. Isto é audível a partir de 100 fps e pode se tornar um pouco irritante, dependendo do jogo.

Durante a operação ociosa, os três ventiladores também podem permanecer desligados por longos períodos de tempo, mas somente no modo Silencioso e ao utilizar a GPU integrada. Entretanto, a maior parte do tempo eles não permanecem completamente desligados durante a navegação, mas os níveis mais baixos de ventiladores a 2000 - 3000 RPM são confortavelmente silenciosos a menos de 33 dB(A).

Barulho

Ocioso
23.9 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB
Carga
35.9 / 55.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.924.827.924.625.52524.421.323.122.321.83124.621.723.422.924.54026.525.72626.628.35023.322.425.322.225.56328.623.924.321.727.28022.722.421.719.930.410022.220.117.715.42612521.921.519.417.629.316022.722.919.920.630.620020.619.314.913.932.125023.520.514.315.136.131526.224.115.114.83940026.62315.414.639.650026.323.313.613.839.463027.522.211.511.140.28002722.61310.340.310002521.39.79.640.4125025.421.89.99.641.9160025.422.210.411.143.3200025.121.111.110.842.8250022.21911.511.140.8315023.520.911.811.839.8400023.121.311.711.938.6500017.314.111.911.739.1630014.512.71211.740.5800015.613.712.511.736.61000015.41412.914.331.81250014.412.712.412.727.61600013.711.711.911.422.2SPL52.535.932.524.123.952.4N8.22.11.50.50.48.2median 23.1median 21.1median 12.4median 11.8median 39median 30.3Delta3.23.62.31.96.222.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
8%
-5%
11%
-9%
-17%
13%
off / environment *
23.9
23.5
2%
24
-0%
23
4%
24.6
-3%
26
-9%
23.9
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
23.8
-0%
26
-9%
23
4%
29.2
-22%
26
-9%
23.9
-0%
Idle Average *
32.6
23.8
27%
28
14%
23
29%
29.2
10%
34
-4%
23.9
27%
Idle Maximum *
32.6
26.8
18%
34
-4%
23.6
28%
29.2
10%
46
-41%
23.9
27%
Load Average *
35.9
37.3
-4%
47
-31%
39
-9%
50.7
-41%
50
-39%
34.3
4%
Load Maximum *
55.8
53.5
4%
56
-0%
51.3
8%
61
-9%
57
-2%
45.9
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
55
51.6
53.3
55

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturas

Há resultados mistos nas temperaturas. As áreas relevantes no caso que são tocadas, tais como o descanso da palma e o teclado, permanecem confortavelmente frias, mesmo durante cenários de estresse mais longos. Mas o ponto quente na área superior da caixa fica relativamente quente até 55 °C (131 °F) enquanto se joga.

 44 °C54 °C43 °C 
 32 °C32 °C35 °C 
 28 °C26 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C
43 °C46 °C42 °C
34 °C41 °C32 °C
26 °C24 °C26 °C
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 64 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
9%
13%
-23%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
40
26%
40.6
25%
53
2%
48.8
10%
Maximum Bottom *
46
37.6
18%
41.1
11%
58
-26%
52.4
-14%
Idle Upper Side *
30
32.4
-8%
26.2
13%
38
-27%
30.4
-1%
Idle Bottom *
31
31.4
-1%
30.3
2%
43
-39%
34.1
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

As temperaturas internas da CPU variam fortemente no teste de estresse. Isto pode ser rastreado até as velocidades de relógio constantemente ajustadas que continuam empurrando a CPU para perto da marca de 100-°C (212°F). Na GPU, a situação é consideravelmente menos crítica, e o RTX 4090 só atinge uma temperatura máxima de 70 °C (158 °F).

Enquanto se joga, as temperaturas da CPU permanecem ligeiramente menos extremas. Medimos entre 81 °C (178 °F, Cyberpunk 2077) e 90 °C (194 °F, The Witcher 3). Por outro lado, entre 72 °C (162 °F, Cyberpunk 2077) e 77 °C (171 °F, The Witcher 3), a GPU fica ligeiramente mais quente do que durante o teste de estresse.

Relógio CPU E-Cores (GHz) Relógio CPU P-Cores(GHz) Relógio GPU (MHz) Temperatura média da CPU (°C) Temperatura média da GPU (°C)
Sistema ocioso (Silencioso) 1.4 1.8 0 42 0
System Idle (Turbo) 1.6 2.1 210 44 39
Prime95 Stress (Turbo) 3 3.5 210 92 56
Prime95 + FurMark Stress (Turbo) 1.6 2.1 2260 80 73
Witcher 3 Stress 3.7 4.6 1995 90 77

Oradores

Os alto-falantes embutidos são relativamente pesados, mas oferecem um desempenho subjetivamente atraente que é adequado para o propósito de jogo do laptop. Em condições diárias, o volume máximo também é suficientemente alto.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.924.62524.622.33123.922.94028.426.65035.222.26346.521.78051.919.910056.415.412560.917.616064.220.620066.613.925069.915.131573.914.840074.214.650069.513.863074.711.180077.810.3100074.29.6125072.79.6160072.311.1200070.410.825006611.1315062.711.8400056.111.9500057.411.7630059.511.7800061.311.7100006414.31250059.612.71600050.911.4SPL23.982.7N0.452.1median 64.2median 11.9Delta7.55.326.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005WApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

Devido ao hardware potente, o consumo de energia do sistema é muito alto. O que se destaca é o altíssimo consumo em standby que sempre alterna entre 5 e 10 watts. Em caso de falha também pode ser a iluminação LED com animação mesmo durante o modo de espera.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 7.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17.3 / 27 / 46 Watt
Carga midlight 133 / 329 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
9%
13%
15%
6%
26%
Idle Minimum *
17.3
15.2
12%
14
19%
13
25%
19.3
-12%
Idle Average *
27
22.8
16%
21.6
20%
19
30%
26.5
2%
Idle Maximum *
46
49.8
-8%
24.8
46%
29
37%
27.1
41%
Load Average *
133
121.2
9%
122.5
8%
143
-8%
141
-6%
Load Maximum *
329
273.7
17%
418
-27%
352
-7%
307.9
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
242
265
247
225

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø272 (195.9-366)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø37.8 (29.1-89.3)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø235 (162.8-253)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø243 (229-316)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø289 (271-315)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø31.4 (26-57.7)

Vida útil da bateria

Devido aos componentes famintos de energia, a bateria de 90-Wh de capacidade não consegue produzir nenhum valor recorde. No modo Optimus (com GPU desativado), Perfil silencioso, e com o brilho reduzido para 150 cd/m², você ainda pode trabalhar por várias horas fora da rede. Nosso teste WLAN funcionou por pouco mais de 7 horas neste modo. No entanto, se você quiser jogar jogos em operação com bateria, não só tem que se contentar com um desempenho significativamente menor, mas a duração da bateria ainda só durou cerca de uma hora em nosso teste (sem limitação de taxa de quadros) com o The Witcher 3.

A bateria foi completamente recarregada após 1h 40min com o sistema desligado ou 1h 45min em operação ociosa. A fonte de alimentação forneceu um máximo de 117 watts naquele momento.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)
7h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 56min
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
15%
5%
29%
-42%
22%
H.264
419
358
-15%
389
-7%
WiFi v1.3
428
365
-15%
319
-25%
324
-24%
250
-42%
Witcher 3 ultra
53
Load
56
81
45%
86
54%
122
118%
Reader / Idle
533
590

Pro

+ desempenho impressionante
+ visor muito rápido de 18 polegadas
+ USB-C com fornecimento de energia

Contra

- choramingar em bobina da GPU a mais de 100 fps
- o caso é propenso a impressões digitais
- sem conexões na parte de trás, USB-A apenas no lado direito (no caminho dos usuários de mouse de mão direita)
- somente o USB-C na parte traseira suporta o Thunderbolt
- sem sensor de luminosidade
- webcam muito fraca

Veredicto

Teste da Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2023) G834JY, unidade de teste fornecida pela Asus Alemanha
Teste da Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2023) G834JY, unidade de teste fornecida pela Asus Alemanha

O Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2023) G834JY é um laptop de alto nível para jogos que o Asus equipou com os componentes móveis mais potentes atualmente disponíveis. A caixa grande abriga um visor muito bom de 18 polegadas que fornece aos jogadores tempos de resposta rápidos, G-SYNC, e boa qualidade de imagem. Mas o destaque do G834JY é certamente o poderoso hardware com um Core i9-13980HX, GeForce RTX 4090 GPU para laptop (175 W TGP), e RAID-0 NVMe SSD. Enquanto estes componentes produzem uma enorme quantidade de calor sob carga, o Asus mantém este bem em controle com um sistema de resfriamento por ventilador triplo, tubo de calor da câmara de vapor e pasta de metal líquido.

O ROG Strix SCAR 18 é um pacote global bem completo com valores de desempenho impressionantes a um preço elevado.

Nossos únicos pontos de reclamação são menores, tais como o chorume da bobina de nossa unidade de teste com altas taxas de quadros, a webcam ruim, ou o posicionamento das portas, que pode ser inferior ao ideal em alguns casos.

Como alternativas, você pode obter os modelos de 18 polegadas com GPU RTX 4090 da Alienware (m18 R1) e Razer (Blade 18). A MSI oferece o Titan GT77 HX 13VI minimamente mais rápido, com um display de 17 polegadas. Aqueles que conseguem se contentar com um pouco menos de desempenho podem dar uma olhada nos modelos baseados no RTX 4080, que são significativamente mais acessíveis. A versão G834JZ do Scar 18 também pode representar uma alternativa interessante aqui.

Preço e Disponibilidade

O G834JY-N6000W que testamos está atualmente disponível apenas na Inglaterra por £3999.99 (preço de lista). Algumas lojas americanas oferecem o G834JY-XS97 atualmente por $3899.99(fora de estoque na Asus), e a Amazon oferece o G834JY-XS97 por $5390.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W - 03/07/2023 v7
Klaus Hinum

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
85%
Conectividade
64 / 80 → 80%
Peso
56 / 10-66 → 82%
Bateria
72 / 95 → 76%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
73 / 90 → 81%
Audio
85%
Camera
32 / 85 → 38%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY revisão - Laptop de jogos com RTX 4090
Klaus Hinum, 2023-02-23 (Update: 2023-02-23)