Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 17z-ak000 (A9-9420, Radeon 530)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 363.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 983:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 AUO41ED , IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -36% | -37% | -43% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.8 | 64.3 -1% | 39.28 -39% | 38.8 -40% | 35.12 -46% |
| sRGB Coverage | 87.5 | 88.5 1% | 58.9 -33% | 58.1 -34% | 52.7 -40% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64 | 64.6 1% | 40.59 -37% | 40.12 -37% | 36.29 -43% |
| Response Times | -9% | -30% | -13% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 40.8 ? -20% | 51.6 ? -52% | 39 ? -15% | 42 ? -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 26.4 ? 3% | 29.2 ? -7% | 30 ? -10% | 22.4 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | ||||
| Screen | 12% | -9% | -7% | -26% | |
| Brightness middle | 363.6 | 333.5 -8% | 256 -30% | 256 -30% | 242.7 -33% |
| Brightness | 349 | 323 -7% | 241 -31% | 252 -28% | 232 -34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 88 -2% | 87 -3% | 88 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.32 14% | 0.21 43% | 0.3 19% | 0.52 -41% |
| Contrast | 983 | 1042 6% | 1219 24% | 853 -13% | 467 -52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4 31% | 5.2 10% | 5.4 7% | 4.9 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10 | 6.9 31% | 19.3 -93% | 9.36 6% | 20.3 -103% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.8 | 4.5 49% | 3.5 60% | 5.37 39% | 2.7 69% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.58 85% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 5900 110% | 6386 102% | 6576 99% | 6795 96% | 6876 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.2 | 57.5 1% | 37 -35% | 37 -35% | 33.5 -41% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87.3 | 88.1 1% | 59 -32% | 58 -34% | 52.5 -40% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
7% | -25% /
-17% | -19% /
-14% | -24% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV | |
| HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| Asus X555LD-XX283H | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
| HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV | |
| Asus X555LD-XX283H | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
| Asus X555LD-XX283H | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
| Asus X555LD-XX283H | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2897 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3174 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3976 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2046 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD | Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -2% | -15% | 13527% | 2% | |
| Read Seq | 90 | 106.9 19% | 96.5 7% | 532 491% | 90 0% |
| Write Seq | 93.4 | 97.5 4% | 77.9 -17% | 511 447% | 90.3 -3% |
| Read 512 | 28.71 | 32.28 12% | 20.82 -27% | 414.8 1345% | 28.47 -1% |
| Write 512 | 44.35 | 35.39 -20% | 19.83 -55% | 307.7 594% | 47.07 6% |
| Read 4k | 0.316 | 0.373 18% | 0.342 8% | 39.51 12403% | 0.31 -2% |
| Write 4k | 0.813 | 0.636 -22% | 0.836 3% | 108.1 13196% | 0.3997 -51% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.711 | 0.694 -2% | 0.595 -16% | 361.6 50758% | 1.021 44% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.87 | 0.682 -22% | 0.706 -19% | 253 28980% | 1.076 24% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2121 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 40215 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3749 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1062 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Doom - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| Overwatch - 1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 71.5 | 43.4 | 35.2 | 21.9 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61.7 | 41.7 | 33.8 | 11.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 24 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 13 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 26.1 | 14.7 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 16.8 | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 35.8 | 30.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 48 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 28 -0% | 28.9 -3% | 30.4 -9% | 30.2 -8% | 28.8 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30.4 -0% | 31.6 -4% | 31.8 -4% | 30.2 1% | 31 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 30.6 | 30.5 -0% | 32 -5% | 31.8 -4% | 30.2 1% | 31 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 30.5 -0% | 32.4 -6% | 31.8 -4% | 32 -5% | 31 -1% |
| Load Average * | 41.6 | 41.5 -0% | 33.3 20% | 31.9 23% | 34.7 17% | 39.1 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 41.8 13% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 48.2 -0% | 35.5 26% | 31.8 34% | 33.9 29% | 41 15% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.18 / 0.44 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8.4 / 11.7 / 24.1 Watt |
| Carga |
50.4 / 62.8 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV A9-9420, Radeon 530, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | 28% | 43% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8.4 | 5.5 35% | 8.3 1% | 4 52% | 6.9 18% |
| Idle Average * | 11.7 | 9.9 15% | 8.6 26% | 9.6 18% | 13.6 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.1 | 14.6 39% | 13.1 46% | 9.7 60% | 14.8 39% |
| Load Average * | 50.4 | 28 44% | 31.2 38% | 27.7 45% | 41 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 58 | 33 43% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 62.8 | 24.6 61% | 43.9 30% | 38.4 39% | 75 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV A9-9420, Radeon 530, 41.6 Wh | HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 i7-7700HQ, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 70 Wh | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 32 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | -20% | 29% | -18% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 466 | 629 35% | 435 -7% | 765 64% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 275 | 341 24% | 176 -36% | 356 29% | 225 -18% | 428 56% |
| Load | 88 | 116 32% | 72 -18% | 97 10% |
Pro
Contra
Os portáteis Pavilion impulsionados por AMD foram todos um teste para a paciência. Não só o desempenho é lento, mas os aplicativos levam muito tempo para serem lançados. Ninguém quer aguardar 6+ segundos para abrir um documento de Word apenas para aguardar outros 6 + segundos para abrir o File Explorer e ainda mais tempo para o Microsoft Edge e o iTunes. Este aspecto, por si só, é suficiente para que não recomendemos qualquer Pavilion AMD equipado com discos rígidos padrão, independentemente da qualidade do chassi ou características da tela.
Com isso fora do caminho, a APU Stoney Ridge A9 e a GPU Radeon 530são um par desequilibrado. Como o nosso anterior A12-9720P Pavilion 17z SKU, as capacidades gráficas da nossa configuração A9 são retidas pelo lento poder de processamento do SoC. As taxas de quadros podem atingir 80% em relação ao HD Graphics 620 ou até 20% dependendo do jogo com os graves custos de maior consumo de energia, menor duração da bateria e ruído da ventoinha significativamente mais alto sob carga. Uma GPU que pode ser tão voraz quanto uma GeForce GTX 950M, mas com o nível de desempenho de uma série Intel Iris ou HD Graphics mais antiga é uma preocupação por conta própria.
O chassi do Pavilion 17z é o do padrão com algumas surpresas. Os alto-falantes internos são decentes e a iluminação de fundo da tela é brilhante para sua classe com uma gama de cores mais ampla do que o esperado. Além desses poucos pontos positivos, esperamos que as futuras revisões de hardware abordem a tela mate granulada, o moderado bleeding da luz de fundo e a manutenção difícil, especialmente para aqueles que querem investir em SSDs.
O Pavilion impulsionado por AMD não consegue decidir se deseja ser um portátil barato de gama baixa ou um cavalo de trabalho de escritório muito acessível. Em ambos os casos, ele cai no chão em ambas as frentes.
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
-
07/18/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
